You are not logged in. Please register or login.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
#81 Re: Guns N' Roses » Incognito at it again » 878 weeks ago
Drop it, or I'll be issuing a temp ban.
James - I respect that - but I hope you just don't mind if I throw this in, to close the debate, as this debate has concluded in a way that does not, in my honest view, put me in a good light.
Thanks.
Am I the only one left wondering after reading that AR tantrum, what the fuck he is even talking about. He kept talking of exposing the truth about me and how I went talking behind his back, yet I simply took the comments that he made in the PUBLIC CHAT, and repeated them here.
You also condemned them or whatever as 'only safe guesses', and then preceded to post several lies about me for whatever reason(s) only beknown to yourself....:rolleyes:
By the way: attaching the above 'stigmas' to my comments is something I regard as 'behind ones back', by the way.:rolleyes:
He didn't make the remark via a PM.
Then why bring the PM/whatever PM up?:rolleyes:
Except where he was ignorant enough to try and bribe me for contact info. *shakes head*
MSL was 'ignorant enough to try and bribe' the guys for new songs a years ago. *shakes head*
AR, you do realize that there are many many others outside of me and MSL who think you are full of it, right?
Well, looking around here, it seems that there an increasing number of people outside of me who regard you as full of it, right?:)
I believe one wise sole said it best once that you try and involve yourself with things that you have nothing to do with. Sorry bro, it's true.
I asked if a guy would 'share his info in the English sector of the forum'. Nothing more, nothing less. Maybe next time I'll just do nothing and leave the fans to stare at the walls (however forward things definitely are moving at this particular moment with the release of this thing).:rolleyes:
As I also said countless times before: if I believe MSL's or anybody's ship it steering toward an iceberg (*ahem*... or what at least looks like an iceberg in the smog up ahead), I will leave the captain on his potentially treacherous course.:rolleyes:
You talk of revealing things anf mention the "poor chinese democracy" community, yet I have a mod from that forum who has called me on the phone just last week to discuss things.
A mod with brains who runs and maintains site - not a 'lowly' , 'short-term contract' fan - I'm sorry: I am not attacking anyone or any one group of people in particular, but this is my honest view - who
I received probably 10-12 PMs today from people telling me they appreciate the efforts.
Again, the said people.:rolleyes:
Here, you may find your hoarding, arrogance, etc. is not appreciated so much, as, the more you post, frankly, the more it becomes known.:rolleyes: 
Certainly posting mistruths behind peoples' backs is not appreciated here; as I would imagine Mr. L. or one of the other admins here has sent you a PM to warn you about, right?:)
Right...?
So again, you are making up stories in your head and try to make things into situations that they aren't.
Any user who wants me to rubbish this statement is going to be disappointed....
Just scroll up to see the answer.:)
At one point throughout that tantrum of yours did you prove or expose anything?
Yes, I did indeed. I proved that:
You are dishonest and post simple (I'm sorry but that's what they were) lies behind my back.
and I exposed that:
you are hoarding, have an attitude, and are full of shit... at least on this playing field.:thumbup:
You lose... again.:(
Well, aside from how much of an immature individual you can truly be. I really do feel sorry for you, man.
You can keep telling youself that. I have proved all I needed to prove. In fact - you have proved it yourself.:)
Nice job.:thumbup:
AR
you always try and get yourself involved in certain things going on, and it just turns into clusterfucks of biblical proportions.
Gotta admit the 'biblical proportions' line was funny.:haha: Good point - and well delivered.
He never attacked you or went behind your back. Just mentioned what you said at cd.com, nothing else.
His posts seem to state otherwise.:rolleyes: Sometimes I don't even think I need to rebut them they are so full of it: but that's just me.:)
Just mentioned what you said at cd.com, nothing else.
And convincing the community (here) that it was a 'safe guess' when in fact it wasn't one - it was an informed opinion, well, at least as far as MSL seems to be one-time concerned (not to bring the great, great man into this... but that's how I read it).
I'm not even gonna mention all the 'endless PMs at various (in fact, non-existence, *ahem*) sites' lie this he made up.:rolleyes:
The topic of this thread has nothing to do with you.
Incognito brought this up and started posting theories (based on 'only safe guesses on his part, as I have already said), and later lies. But why are my rebuttals getting the penalising? I just don't get this James. I always put in a good word for this site + it's members - but why do I find this stuff over here??:(
I just don't get it, JL. Incognito started this one, not me. Page 4 proves it.:)
If... Incognito... or anyone else wants to start a subject regarding various aspects of this shit here, they are free to do so at any time.
James, I just don't get this, man. Why is he appearing to get 'praise' not cautioning? Did I miss something? Why not a warning not to spin his shit here, make/coerce judgements about other people and their intentions when they are not here to defend themselves (he could at least get reminded about that one), and throw his own 'bizarre' agenda around here (his PM 'fairytales'/fantasies(:o))?:rolleyes:
I just don't get it man.
Drop it, or I'll be issuing a temp ban.
Again, I hope you don't mind me mentioning this here, again: but that's just how I feel. I cannot let this nonsense go unchallenged.
Thanks for your input and that's me done. I've said all that needs to be said. Again - mods, thanks for being patient with me. I know this is... 'unique' to the GN'R community, but... oh well.:peace:
AR
#82 Re: Guns N' Roses » Incognito at it again » 878 weeks ago
Just spotted this:
Just for the record, I wouldn't even say that I don't like him. >>>I don't know him well enough to remark like that.<<<
People, this is as clear as day!!! 'I don't know him well enough to remark like that'. Yet, you make posts behind my back judging me, encouraging others what the truth is (to you, if no one else, anyway, IMHV), and posting simple mistruths about alleging seemingly endless PMs, 'only safe guesses', 'wannabee insider', and whatever else that stuff was you said.:rolleyes:
Sheesh.
I just think it's ridiculous to come here and attack me with accusations and namecalling just because he didn't like an answer that I gave him via a PM on another forum.
What PM?? What PM 'didn't (I) like'?
For someone who 'I wouldn't even say that I don't like', you sure have a funny way of showing it.:rolleyes:
And by the way: 'I just think it's ridiculous to come here and attack me with accusations and namecalling': well what the hell was your post??
:mad::mad:
Keeping in mind that he initiated the conversation with me, and all I did was answer him honestly. I guess that wasn't good enough.
You posted lies here behind my back. In fact - the 'only safe guesses' were made by YOU over the info thing.
As always, arguments still don't fly.:rolleyes:
Consider it dropped.
If you think we are leaving it that you really don't know me well enough....
From what we've seen before I would be surprised if Axl was 'ok' with him leaving to go to NIN. I assumed that because we never got it axl was either deeply hurt of hoping to sway him back at some stage.
Unless, as Mysteron says, they do bargain on Finck making an 'intelligent guess' and maybe coming back one day (I guess it would have to be soon though, what, with the release *looking*(?) imminent and all that). Maybe this is in fact the reason why Axl didn't write this seeming 50-50 rumoured 'open letter' (if this 'info' was, of course, in fact true in the first place), who knows.:)
Admins - we'll talk. Not now, but in the next few days. My apologies for any distress Incognito may have caused anyone.
AR
#83 Re: Guns N' Roses » Incognito at it again » 878 weeks ago
I'm hoping this will not be my last post here, as this turns into one of the most heated things I have read for a while.:rolleyes: But seeing as Incognito's post is one long lie about me - that the admins seem keen not to penalise (I hope that's not my account gone?:/) - he leaves me no choice...:
Arcade Roses wrote:2. You have less chance of being told it after blabbing on here.
Do these postings of yours now cause you a similar problem since you appear to have done the same thing?
I already 'blabbed' - and am on bad terms with the 'Spanish' guys/whoever they are.
Incog. just did the same in some way - and, if you read what I said about him not knowing the info (though there may be two rational explanations for this as I posted above), he can hardly accuse me of making 'only safe guesses' and being the 'wannabee insider' (not even spelt right!) that he says I am....
James... no offence man, but why not warn him??:/
Arcade Roses wrote:Right listen up you hoarding richboy...
Lose the attitude...
James, in my view I don't have an 'attitude'. I am just perturbed when this guy comes on here, posting info (not to mention behind my back) when he doesn't know the full story and hence phrasing things in way that make me look bad. He gets people to agree on a consensus that, '(...) it's only a safe guess', when in fact I have my rational for making such a comment, as I explain/ed.
Why should I just let that happen?
Come on it wasn't offensive really was it. Kind of tongue-in-cheek, actually.:haha:
Only 'attitude' here that's noticeable is Incognito's arrogance in my honest view now he is open that he has at least one new thing most of us want....
You insinuate it is further down your post...
In which bit of the post?
I never used the term 'inside info'.
I regard it as info from some people with 'info' that may have 'come' from the '*inside*', I can't say any more than that.
This letter wouldn't tell fans the release date of the album. All I know - and that's the key point - is that it would tell fans the reason for the delay of the album. But it was late April (this year) that I heard this information so plans may have changed now....
Anything said in April by a random forum member is irrelevant.
MSL doesn't think so.
By the way, speaking of MSL, remember these guys confirmed to me/told me (I honestly have no idea how true it is) that some of the earlier leaks came from Fernando, which is of course news in the community at the moment. Again, I don't know how true it is. Just that's what I heard.
Apparently the reason for the update is to 'put the fans against FINCK'
Bullshit. Only a few people care about him, and there's no point in Axl/Azoff going down that road again.
What? The only other guitarist who is all over the leaks (the other being the great BH). How do you work that out?
Even if Axl is going in a NIN direction now - it is relevant to us here in the community, in my honest view. Even if Finck's departure was, ironically, the reason for this new direction....
No you haven't - and that's because
1. I can only imagine you are now out of the loop with these guys/to some extents MSL (though again this may, of course, be 'misinformation'; or they did not tell this info to everyone)...
2. You have less chance of being told it after blabbing on here.Not playing that game here.
Maybe a phrased my response bad there... response should have read something along the lines of:
These are the reasons you don't know/haven't heard of this (yet?)/and likely won't now... (and he brought this on himself... by the way, by his very posting it here) (based on my earlier 'fallout' with MSL).
Also factor in his last comment and how can you expect me not to make such a response - though I may have done it rather, erm... inappropriately there. Again, I apologise if that bit came across in a bad way....
I just figured I'd be nice instead of calling you the open hoarder you have become...
and confirmed to me just now in PMs.
I am not hoarding this info - I am releasing it.
You are hoarding the VMAs - and your arrogance alone is starting to prove that.Like I said.....not playing that game here.
'Hoarders play games' - James L. (in a post post).
As MSL has found out... if you don't play at least one of your own cards/roll the dice/etc. at some point, nothing will get done, IMHO.
my post isnt directed at you nor is it about you AR
hell my post isnt even in response to that post by incog
it was in response to this one
Incognito wrote:Neemo wrote:your guess is as good as mine...i would say probably...wasnt that clown speaking in tongues as well?
Don't know about that. I read that idolator article that mentioned evolution and how we supposedly have "insiders" among us. I think the quack at cd.com admitted to be phony.
OK. I thought it was in relation to Incog.'s above: and just posted it to highlight that he was posting my info and presenting it with spin while coercing people to conclusions, in my honest view, which were far from the truth('(...) it's only a safe guess'), and made without hearing my input/my side of the story.:rolleyes: That's pretty low, in my honest opinion....
No offence to anyone, but I did think... no, I fact I know that people on here are smarter than that, hence why I only post primarily on this forum now. Not got time for the BBF worship of CD.com, the fake 'Azoff's, the endless 'Randy' threads (though he does sometimes cough up a few genuine good ones!:mosh:) of mygnr, etc....
And now... Incognito.
No offense man, but everytime I talk with you, I feel like I'm having a conversation with a 6 year old little kid.
If I am a '6 year old little kid', then what are those poor unfortunate soles who you must manipulate on CD.com every week in order to get your will/way (see below for more on this; note for admins: I believe I am justified and within the rules of the forum for saying this, as I will explain all below...).
My conversations are mature and respectful. You just shy away and, it seems, come and here and slander people like my who are just determined to honestly investigate this stuff. That's all I am doing. Though that seems also what you are doing.:rolleyes:
You even ignore some of my PMs, never mind 'conversation's!:o
And, I am such a '6 year old little kid'... why just send me such a revealing PM, which I would have addressed were it not for the shite you are spinning here (again, people: see below).
"Hoarding Rich Boy?" You have no idea the chuckle you have just given me
A 'chuckle? I think it was more likely a shiver up the spine: as one word I used should indicate that I know more about you than you think....
- and just how much of a joke that you have become throughout the community.
I see threads constantly bashing your process/hoarding/attitude (sorry JL & co. - but this is just MHO, if I am not breaking the rules?), whereas people praising me for my intelligent threads (the Azoff-BH thread from a while ago), my 'detective' work (clearing up the 'Thyme' fiasco, my talk with the 'Spanish' guy/guys), etc..
Even in this thread respect for you is going down. I can tell you it is on CD.com too. So this is yet again another argument of yours that doesn't fly....
Just to get the rest of Evolution up-to-date
If you like maybe I could 'get the rest of Evolution up-to-date' as well? Bigbri looks to be threatening to do so.... It wouldn't surprise me if several other people are....
Again, JMO, guys.
, this wannabee trader typically spams my inbox at least once a week on different sites
WHAT A FUCKING LIE! In case you didn't know: I only contacted you once or twice (once today notwithstanding though) on just one site: that being, of course, CD.com.
Unless someone else is pretending to be me.:/
'Wannabee trader' (learn how to spell FFS): what 'wannabee trader' would have given the community such things as:
-The Welcome to the Jungle... the Very Best Of... artwork,
-Info from Marco Beltrami on the '8 songs (not 4)' thing,
-'Thyme' clarification,
-Possible 'info' on various 'behind the scenes subjects' (came to me unsolicited though),
-Trying to continue to help get new info/etc. to the public.
You got us some leaks (indirectly through your offer, so we hear) - fair offer. Well done. But you hoard all high and mighty like you are... I don't know what to say: above us all?
How's the weather in Lisbon?:rolleyes: 
, acting like he has "in the know" info or material that he is willing to come off with, if only I will "hook him up" with something first.
Yeah, only did that once - tonight, with the 'RazZ' bribe. Some less smart person got there first and did not ask for anything substantial in return (notice how I don't spoil your 'party' further and mention that, he has since received it, *cough* *cough*). Just goes to show how you manipulate the - and again, JL and co. - I am being honest here: you read the site, after all.... - 'lesser blessed' (*cough *cough*... 'BBF worshipers', *cough* *cough*) people of CD.com and 'cut corners' when dealing with the people who produce like me... and, it seems from your earlier response to my 'letter' (possible) claim, these supposed fellows in 'Spain' or wherever the f**k they are.
Fair enough, you talk to real hoarders - but you slam me publicly while manipulating the 'CD.com-ians' to your advantage.
Yeah, keep attacking me. The truth is coming out. People are starting to see who's side you're really on.
I won't even get into all the specifics because MSL did a pretty damn good job of owning this "outsider information guy" about a week ago.
'Au contraire, mon frère.':rolleyes: He didn't 'own me'. If anything, he confirmed what I said above. That I:
1. Was right (even it is just at least 0.01%),
2. Parts of my info were at least 0.01% correct (as I had been fed 'misinformation', or something 
),
3. That my investigations are of value to this community. Period. Go look at the facts.
Your arguments just do not fly. You can buy leaks but not facts!:rolleyes:
I just thought it was important to point out why he is showing these childish public outbursts at a few of us. I personally feel sorry for him.
Again, what 'childish public outbursts'? What 'few of us'? I am just refuting the shite YOU are spinning on this thread - i.e.: that I am making 'only safe guesses' and that I am a 'wannabeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee insider':rolleyes:), quoting other peoples' posts when relevant/to back up my case, and showing the forum what an 'attitude' really is.
Your arguments once again don't match the truth. You lose. You're exposed. You're history.
You are the weakest link.............................................................................. goodbye.
#84 Re: Guns N' Roses » Incognito at it again » 878 weeks ago
Right listen up you hoarding richboy...
AR is in the chat @ cd.com claiming to have inside info that Rose is preparing to release another open letter. Anyone else hearing this?
whats classified as an "insider" though? anyway its not surprising, there are several people that i know of on this board who have contacts with different "people" ...i wouldnt be shocked if there are more to be honest
I've never claimed it to be 'inside info'. Stop putting words into my mouth, hoarder (Incog.). If anything, it's 'outside info'.
Incognito wrote:AR is in the chat @ cd.com claiming to have inside info that Rose is preparing to release another open letter. Anyone else hearing this?
I'm not hearing that, and how does AR have "inside info"??
Its just a safe guess. Shackler is out, and Rock Band 2 is near. Someone from GNR has to make a statement, so why not the king himself?
This letter wouldn't tell fans the release date of the album. All I know - and that's the key point - is that it would tell fans the reason for the delay of the album. But it was late April (this year) that I heard this information so plans may have changed now....
As you should know, this information came to the Spanish-speaking guy I spoke to earlier this year - and he has been partly vindicated by some of MSL's recent findings/posts.
Apparently the reason for the update is to 'put the fans against FINCK', if I am reading this stuff right.... Again - don't shoot the messenger. Remember, I only asked for info. Nothing wrong with that....
I agree it's only a safe guess.
I haven't heard anything like that either.
No you haven't - and that's because
1. I can only imagine you are now out of the loop with these guys/to some extents MSL (though again this may, of course, be 'misinformation'; or they did not tell this info to everyone)...
2. You have less chance of being told it after blabbing on here.
I just figured I'd be nice about it instead of calling him the wannabee insider that I think he is.
I just figured I'd be nice instead of calling you the open hoarder you have become...
and confirmed to me just now in PMs.
I am not hoarding this info - I am releasing it.
You are hoarding the VMAs - and your arrogance alone is starting to prove that.
AR
#85 Re: Guns N' Roses » Incognito at it again » 878 weeks ago
I would like to know more about Axl and Bucket's 'relationship', from what I hear and have read they seem like siblings.
Seeing as I don't seem to be on good terms with certain Spanish-speaking people at the moment, I'll tell you a bit more of what one guy told me. Apparently, Fernando - if this is true - said that Axl and Bucket were like 'Corey Feldman and Corey Haim'. That's, if accurate, why Bucket's loss continues to cripple GN'R to this day - as if it needed spelling out for me/any of us(?) though.:/
I really would not be surprised if they are still trying to get him (and Brain?) back.
sic. wrote:ereeper wrote:Maybe he should be 10 second clip on youtube to lure in a potential trader.
It's been out there for over a year.
Never saw that. Thanks for the tip!
No, I've never seen it either. Thanks for the link, sic.!:)
#86 Re: Guns N' Roses » GNR's 'Democracy' To Be Retail Exclusive? » 879 weeks ago
Arcade Roses wrote:But he has time to post in waaay off-topic threads like 'What did you eat tonight?' or 'So-and-so fancies so-and-so' (seriously this is how bad the site is!), yet not handle long-time, loyal members PMs?
Well, I post in many sections here. I like chit chatting with the people here. That doesn't mean that if a PM goes unnoticed by me that it was intentional.
The PM system here is smaller - and is thus more likely to be 'ignored', no offence, as an admin at the top of your game like yourself would have to delete PMs to deal with all the calls for assistance.... Also, you're the only person 'on duty' at this moment.
You also get to them on second or so contact not having a third ignored down the line.... Because CD.com is a much bigger forum, the PMs should be there. IMHO, BP - and some of the other admins too, based on my experience/reading the board in general - is working selectively.
Not to kick up a fuss about this; but I just feel contacting BP or an admin about this 'problem' would be to no avail. Even anythinggoes - a good poster/administrator - ignored my post the other day asking why this fiasco was allowed to continue. 'Oh, my frustrations.
Oh, my salvation.
Caught in the lies
No one I love is there
Somewhere in time
When will I, get there?'
Just my twoC.
#87 Re: Guns N' Roses » GNR's 'Democracy' To Be Retail Exclusive? » 879 weeks ago
Talk about insulting somebody.:laugh: Thats a low blow.
I have nothing against BP, James; just am annoyed by the whole situation over there. The degeneration of the forum in general, the requests being ignored thing, and now this Azoff-threat thing. My, the amount of 'back alleys' there are on that forum is extraordinary and is sad to see it go so low....
He's busy!!!
...
I'm sure BP has the same stance. If I'm pretty busy here, can you imagine how an admin on a site with a few thousand members feels like?
But he has time to post in waaay off-topic threads like 'What did you eat tonight?' or 'So-and-so fancies so-and-so' (seriously this is how bad the site is!), yet not handle long-time, loyal members PMs?
Figures.
Again, not attacking BP/the admins there: that's how the situation is there, and sometimes it just... just saddens me, I guess. As the first forum I *discovered*, I am attached to it, but not the BBF worshipping website it's become.
The days of intelligent debate between Markus Asraelius and co. now just seem like a distant memory.
#88 Re: Guns N' Roses » GNR's 'Democracy' To Be Retail Exclusive? » 879 weeks ago
That impersonator seems to be in that chat room for looong periods of time.
The reason I bring it up here that - while I don't want to be banned at CD.com for criticising the admin - but BP is, IMHO, as bad as Brody. I sent him three PMs last year (though about a less important matter) and it took several months to get another admin(!) to attend to my PM!
Newgnr.com is better in this regard.
Plus when I had a look a few days ago this clown was posting youtube vid links to stupid things.
I never saw that.:/
He also got sucked in making a comment about Irving - thinking it was another person. At least if the guy was going to impersonate Azoff he might want to learn what his own first name is.
Yeah, I call him Andy Azoff, for some reason. Probably has a nice ring to it.:haha:
#89 Re: Guns N' Roses » GNR's 'Democracy' To Be Retail Exclusive? » 879 weeks ago
Right, can somebody clear this up, NOW:
[Matty22] 2:49 am: this is the one thing ill agree with
[Arcade Roses] 2:49 am: Chase in answer to your earlier question WE KNOW WHO PLAYS THE PARTS. On the
leaks, BH, Finck, Huge, Stinson (bass), etc.. Live, 4tus/BBF attempt BH, etc..
[eye2eye] 2:49 am: only his riffs on few songs are good and Slither solo is nice
[The Lounge]: hitmanhart408 has entered at 2:50 am
[Chase the Ace] 2:50 am: well here is what i will repeat
[axl_04] 2:50 am: Why can't we just all have our own opinion. U r never going to convince the other person
[eye2eye] 2:50 am: but majority of songs he sucks , he is good when he palyes solo like "hey Joe "
[Arcade Roses] 2:50 am: Ok, fair enough.
[Chase the Ace] 2:50 am: get your head out of Bucket's ass and realize he isn't coming back
[eye2eye] 2:51 am: I just want to know, why BBF shred on KOHD, and whre is his feeling playing, he doesn't
even play "Madagascar" which has great feeling solo by Buckethead
[The Lounge]: gnrforever has left at 2:51 am
[eye2eye] 2:51 am: Buckethead has enourmour feeling , and emotional playing
[Chase the Ace] 2:51 am: I don't remember Bucket having a solo in Maddy
[axl_04] 2:51 am: lol chase. If Buckethead is so great then why did he use Axl to gain popularity?
[Arcade Roses] 2:51 am: But just remember this: Axl begged BH back before and I would not be surprised if he is
doing so again. He WANTS to give us good music, and could not do so with 'impersonators' like 4tus and Bumble
now being the only guitarists in the band, Frank drumming/banging, MSL threatening pointless leaks when the album
IS coming, and other matters. These are facts. END OF STORY.
[Matty22] 2:51 am: It's the middle onechase
[AZOFF] 2:52 am: For Christ Sakes, Bumble was in the band not enough time to learn the material to learn the
material before they started touring. Bumble learned the songs on the road. The others were playing those songs for
years. As the tour went on Bumble got better and better and started taking over more solos.
[Matty22] 2:52 am: Bucket won't re join GNR
[Chase the Ace] 2:52 am: thank you AZOFF
[Chase the Ace] 2:52 am: this is why I love you
[Matty22] 2:52 am: Azoff is win
[Arcade Roses] 2:53 am: Hello AZOFF. I have a question: are you Irving Azoff, manager of the band, or someone
else?
[Arcade Roses] 2:53 am: Matty I agree I doubt BH will come back but who knows.
[The Lounge]: Incognito1 has entered at 2:53 am
[The Lounge]: Bumbles N Roses has left at 2:53 am
[Matty22] 2:53 am: Well Axl said some really harsh shit about him when he left and Bucket HAS to do
stuff constantly
[Chase the Ace] 2:54 am: I like Angus Young more than anyother guitarist in GNR other than Fortus
[AZOFF] 2:54 am: There is many people watching you right now.
[Arcade Roses] 2:54 am: AZOFF, re.: 'As the tour went on Bumble got better and better and started taking over more
solos'. Yes, the ABSENSE OF 'T.W.A.T.' just goes to show how true that really is....
[DrRedFox] 2:54 am: cool chase
[Arcade Roses] 2:54 am: What does that mean??
[Chase the Ace] 2:54 am: TWAT wasn't needed live
[eye2eye] 2:54 am: yeah sure, but why he shred on KOHD ??
[Matty22] 2:54 am: haha we're providing entertainment for AZOFF and his guests
Impersonating Azoff is one thing, but the guy sending out threats like this is another.
Can someone clear this up once and for all?
Thanks.
#90 Re: Management » hey james, would you cave? » 879 weeks ago
Welcome to the forum anythinggoes.
The only person banned at CD.com in the last couple or weeks was Incognito, MLS is not banned from the site, but any links to his website are not being allowed, this is not at a Request of GNR management and as as many of you may know BP is on Vacation at the moment and not back till the 24th Aug a message has been posted explaining why BP doesnt want the Links to MSL's site on his website. Im sorry so many of you believe that there is a big GNR management cover up conspiricy going on but its not. The problem is MSL has leaked this song and now he has people eating outta his hand believing everything he says, what is said in that interview is a one sided event, possibly highly exagerated, i personally dont know as i was not there listening in on phone calls or exchanging songs. The problem is im writing this and many of you are probably thinking bullshit to it all, but you dont think that to some of MSLs posts.
Anyhow who you choose to believe its up to you.
Why is that Azoff impersonator being allowed to post/chat/whatever on the forum?
Cant you just wait for the release?
Irving didn't post that.
Irving Azoff doesn't have bipolar disorder or whatever the last time I checked.:rolleyes:
