I agree 100%. There is nothing sadder than trying to hide behind grammar when your position is faulty.
And that is exactly what you did my dear boy.

You cracked the the old grammar defense with Buzzsaw here:

You did this in purest ignorance of course, as is your want my good sir, and then after probably googling "present tense" you returned to edit your original post to further enforce your argument about Buzz's grammar

A most foolish and embarrassing misstep for one who was just about to launch the argument:

I couldn't agree more Mr Saint Laurent. By your own admission "but when you can't even get that right, boy oh boy do you look pathetic".

Well played good sir.

Now I'm going to introduce you to 2 new concepts here. The first is called Science and the second is called Books.
We use the first to determine if something is true and the second to record that information.
So here is a book on the science of lingustics which discusses how it is that people interpret tenses.
I suggest you take a few quite moments with it. Skim it. Let that old high IQ noggin of yours absorb the information and then please DEAR LORD PLEASE, consider it the next time you're about to make an idiotic statement about the objectivity of language.

https://books.google.ie/books?hl=en&lr= … se&f=false

Shall we continue?

Now at this point you attempt to throw out some non-evident conjecture and hearsay to fight your corner.
for the sake of the good folks reading this thread I'll try to take the less retarded approach of providing evidence for my staements.
That way we can see who is presenting facts and who is spouting utter shit.

Yes. you also bgan the hype machine that would culminate in selling t-shirts on your site, endless self promotion and gnrtruth. Evidence: mistersaintlaurent.com & GNR Truth.

You're attempts to control the narrative of your site is clunky and obvious. The number 1 criticism of your site is not for you to decide. It is for the public to decide.  So lets ask.

Who agrees that GNRTruth is made up of a bunch of nut swingers who hang around massaging MSL's ego hoping he'll give them a new ChiDem era track?

I never claimed they had. I said we don't know for sure if that is the case. I can see how my statement as written could be interpreted (as often happens with language) as meaning that they definitely had given you tickets. Also I noticed you haven't mentioned the legal aspect here. Should we interpret that as meaning that GNR did threaten legal action?

Evidence dea boy. Evidence. We've discussed this. You need to prove these claims you're making like I'm doing here.

"and videos" lol.

It's no false narrative. Information without valid evidence is just noise. You have never produced a shred of evidence.

I meant the GNR fanbaords are the smallest most insignificant part of the internet. Which we surely are. But again, language is open to interpretation.

[/embed]

Wow that is great to see.

That's is not a fact. The application of a tense in this case is open to interpretation. This is the perfect metaphor for your modus operandi. You pass on information that could be interpreted multiple ways and once the truth reveals itself you claim one specific point of view on that info is the actual objective point you always intended to make.
It is the same snake oil stick fortune tellers and horoscope readers use.  Your website is full of nutswingers who desperately  want to believe you have an inside track so that they can have more access to the band through you.

Now let's discuss the difference between opinion and fact.

After the Skwerl leaks your behaviour changed drastically. It is almost as if GNR made contact and told you to play ball or get sued. Since then every tidbit you drop makrs gnr seem like gods, axl seem like a saint and you seem like his high priest. You run a nutswingers propaganda site. You delete anything that runs contrary to your nutswinging agenda. Those are facts. We can all observe those points publicly. They're not open to interpretation. That is how facts work.

What we dont know for sure is whether it was the tickets they gave you or the threat of legal action that forced you to erect your propaganda site.  But we all have opinions on that. And that is how opinions work. I'm sure now that I've offered dome examples from your own life that you are starting understand the distinction between opinion and fact.

Either way it doesn't matter now because with the new lineup change you are out of the loop. Your tracks don't matter as much as they once did. Beyond a few hardcoees no one really wants a GNR track that hasn't got Slash and Duff on it. On top of that it would seem your links to the band might be gone. Was BBF your link? Again I don't know the exact facts there. But your behaviour indicates that you are out and so trying to kick up controversy again to manipulate your way back in.

So now we have to watch you clamour for attention again as you try to worm your way back into some kind of power position. You need to feel important and powerful your ego demands it so you will the start the process again and we will watch your pitiful cries for attention and demands for power and authority in this the smallest most insignificant corner of the internet. That is a mixture of an opinion a fact and a future projection. I predict you are going to start kicking up a shit storm looking for attention from GNR again. My theory is that you do that to feel special. My gut feeling is that you will go too far this time and end up in court.

I'm looking forward to watching you make an idiot out of yourself. That is an admission.

So you'd build a wall and make Mexico pay for it if it were possible to do it in an economical manner?

That was Viv Campbell on Stand Up and Shout.