You are not logged in. Please register or login.

#71 Re: Guns N' Roses » The General confirmed next » 106 weeks ago

James wrote:

None of that world even remains anymore.

This is what really brings him down several notches in my book. He used to be #1 on all my lists in my youth...now he's lucky if he can crack the top 10.

He didn't have anything to say about the massive cultural shift of the 21st century. That just blows my mind. Like you said, anything "new" is from a time capsule when he was dealing with Slash and Steph shit and couldn't get over the implosion of GNR.

This is the biggest issue IMO. Axl is a really good songwriter, he's an astute observer of the world and its prevailing political, social and cultural trends… and he has had nothing to say lyrically since the early '00s. To take a random example: when he was ranting about Trump on Twitter, why wasn't he channeling that into a song? Why isn't he writing about the state of the world now, instead of the state of his relationships in 2001?

#72 Re: Guns N' Roses » The General confirmed next » 106 weeks ago

AgesOfTheIce wrote:

Radio Rock (Italian site who first broke the story of Perhaps being delayed a week, according to them given from an internal source) says The General will not will be released digitally either for purchase or streaming:

https://radiorock.it/guns-n-roses-la-nu … B1KC2VfaRk

What the fuck. Why would they do that? It's leaving money on the table. I don't have a vinyl player, so you better believe I'm going to be downloading a high-quality rip of it.

#73 Re: Guns N' Roses » The General confirmed next » 106 weeks ago

slashsfro wrote:
Wagszilla wrote:

And while "Prostitute" was a little less fire than I would've wanted, I love that track. It's 100% the direction they should've ran with, unfortunately we only got scraps of what could've been.

I've been listening to the locker leaks and that song I've gained a better appreciation for.  I just love the "soundscape" aspect of it.  It's a deep cut and not really accesible to casuals.

I adore the "weeee-oooo" synths in the second verse. Not sure what you'd call them, properly.

#74 Re: Guns N' Roses » What song do you want to hear most? » 107 weeks ago

Shacklermyrye wrote:
elevendayempire wrote:
TheSundanceKid wrote:

Yeah I want to hear that in full!

Yeah, I'd love to hear it. Even if it's just an instrumental, you could layer the vocals from… was it Rock Band or Guitar Hero? I'm sure there was an isolated vocal track for Jungle.

Better off using live vocals. Here is a clip of jungle with 2007 vocals on i just did https://www.sendspace.com/file/661ho2
It takes some work to timestretch parts to get it to work so the whole track would take a while, sounds ok to me though

That's neat. Could you chuck over the full audio of the instrumental?

#75 Re: Guns N' Roses » What song do you want to hear most? » 107 weeks ago

TheSundanceKid wrote:
elevendayempire wrote:
Frozeninfernot800 wrote:

I honestly just want to hear nightrain 2001 rerecord... The wttj leak was ace.

Or realdoll.

Wait, the re-recorded WTTJ leaked? When did this happen?

Yeah I want to hear that in full!

Yeah, I'd love to hear it. Even if it's just an instrumental, you could layer the vocals from… was it Rock Band or Guitar Hero? I'm sure there was an isolated vocal track for Jungle.

#76 Re: Guns N' Roses » What song do you want to hear most? » 107 weeks ago

Frozeninfernot800 wrote:

I honestly just want to hear nightrain 2001 rerecord... The wttj leak was ace.

Or realdoll.

Wait, the re-recorded WTTJ leaked? When did this happen?

#77 Re: Guns N' Roses » Atlas Shrugged (2023 ) - Rumour » 108 weeks ago

Axl S wrote:

I have reason to doubt the band will follow through and stick to plans.

Why? I mean, what reason have they given you to doubt them? They've just released Perhaps with a major promo push including a video.

#78 Re: Guns N' Roses » The next GNR album: Current known state of songs » 108 weeks ago

Sky Dog wrote:

So do I…..they didn’t need a 3rd guitarist once Bucket joined Bucket lead and Robin rhythm and lead on a few songs

I'm not sure Robin would've worked as a rhythm player – plus he was explicitly brought on board as a lead guitarist, so a "demotion" to rhythm would've stung his ego.

Axl should've committed to two guitarists in 2000: a rhythm player and a lead. Either Huge/Finck or Huge/Buckethead, or Fortus/Finck or Fortus/Buckethead. And had whoever ended up taking the lead role re-record the extant guitar parts. No fucking about "honoring the material recorded by previous contributors," just make sure that whoever is up on stage is the person playing the relevant bit on the album.

With two lead guitarists you immediately create the impression that "no one individual can replace Slash," on top of which you end up with one of them standing around with nothing to do for half the songs (seriously, watch Think About You from 2002, you've got Buckethead playing chords ffs).

My own preference would be for a Fortus/Buckethead combo. As much as I love Finck, he's very much an acquired taste, plus the version of the album recorded with Finck doesn't have those extra flourishes that Buckethead adds. Basically: Buckethead is more than capable of playing the Finck solo in TWAT, but I suspect that the Buckethead solo would sound very different in Finck's hands. Plus Buckethead is an iconic figure; instantly recognisable in silhouette, the same as Slash. It's telling that all the interest in the band in 2001-02 zeroed in on Buckethead, and even years later he was the figure most associated with Chinese Democracy-era GN'R.

#79 Re: Guns N' Roses » Perhaps (2023) to Drop » 108 weeks ago

monkeychow wrote:
misterID wrote:

Cool. I’m happy for them. Even Fernando

I was listening to Melissa’s cover of Sorry and she really needs to be utilized more

Her take on Sorry made me appreciate Axl's songwriting more.

Like you can see how he could write pop songs like that rather than just rock.

Reminds me of when Cornell did that scream album with timberland.

Wait, there's a Melissa cover of Sorry?

#80 Re: Guns N' Roses » The next GNR album: Current known state of songs » 108 weeks ago

ClaudeF wrote:

It seems 10 or 12 songs is the bare minimum of tracks for an album these days, so to hit that threshold the band would need as little as one, two, or three more songs.

They could easily pad it out with covers, of course. Wichita Lineman, The Seeker, etc. Maybe get Duff to give the band a new solo track, whack a Slash solo on it and call it a GN'R song.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB