You are not logged in. Please register or login.

#4962 Re: Guns N' Roses » How much of the board actually believes a reunion will happen? » 573 weeks ago

My thoughts are that a reunion is not close to happening and if i had to bet my life on it I would say that the odds are quite low. There are really two comments I'd like to make regarding this topic.

I've been around these message boards (most loyal to here, of course) since the late 1990s. I've been around long enough to see at least a few patterns in ebs and flows of the conversation and buzz surrounding this band. These are the things I noticed.

1) Hardcore Gn'R fans have been soooo deprived of any stimulation from this band for so long that sometimes we create our own stimulation. As optimistic as I would like to be about a possible reunion, I think the latest swing in optimism is self-stimulation from a group of people starved for stimulation and a need to find some reason to continue to justify following this band.

2) Hardcore Gn'R fans suffer from a rare from abuse, and like many abused fans we blame ourselves and come back for more only for the same cycle to repeat. 16

I honestly expect more of the same....long, dormant periods followed by tours/Vegas type stuff. As I understand it, all of these players were employees of Gn'R, not really members of a band as you and I would define them. Their 'leaving' may just be a way to save money. I honestly never understood paying DJ, Robin, Bumble...etc....for years of dormancy. I don't know how many years Axl has in him. Also, I feel like if he really gave a crap about being creative, he would have produced a bit more than he has produced at this point. So in terms of new material....I really don't think he gives a crap about it. He may like to tinker, and play around in the studio...but to take it to the point producing a professional piece of art....I just don't think he cares about it. It's easy to just do nostalgia acts for HUGE paydays.

I don't blame him for it either.

I remember James posting several times over the years that he thought perhaps the creativity pump had run dry after the illusions. I can't remember his thought process on that...maybe he could reiterate it for us if he is so inclined.

So sadly, no...I don't believe a reunion will happen. sad

#4963 Re: Guns N' Roses » GnREvolution Chinese Democracy Elimination 2015 - Round 9 » 577 weeks ago

I'm going with street of dreams, I liked the demos better.

#4964 Re: Guns N' Roses » DJ has left GNR » 586 weeks ago

I think axl should leave the band now too....who would that leave?

#4965 Re: Guns N' Roses » Why Slash's fans can't stop talking about the "cancer" » 595 weeks ago

This might possibly be the dumbest thread of the year....

Anyone want to set lists from the 2006 tour???

Christ....

#4966 Re: Guns N' Roses » Doug Goldstein Letter to Axl » 603 weeks ago

Man....never knew what a sleaze Doug could be....

And all this conjuring up of scenarios feels so sad to me, partly because they all seem like things that could have actually happened.

But honestly...what it really feels like is going back to the tombstone of a long lost departed close friend. I can't believe how much time has passed. We all keep coming back to this forum to revisit tombstones.

When I discovered GNR I was a freshman in high school and the year was 1997. It had only been 4 years since their last concert, and I had such hopes of reconciliation, realistically thinking that by my senior year of high school, something would certainly change.

All we've been left with is rehash upon rehash relating to even some of the most behind the scenes characters of the story.

Anyway, I feel a deep sense of meloncholly after reading this thread from its very first post. Just wondering if anyone else feels the same.

#4967 Re: Guns N' Roses » False - Axl to Join Slash on Brazil Dates » 610 weeks ago

Hey guys, I know this may sound like a stupid question at first but after all these years I'd like to really understand why it won't happen. By asking this question I do not imply that I think it ever will, I simply am trying to understand after 20 years why it's still so difficult to bury the hatchet.

Does it really all just come down to ego? Is Axel just permanently pissed off at/forever? I wouldn't blame him.

#4968 Re: The Garden » Super Bowl 49 » 610 weeks ago

faldor wrote:
mitchejw wrote:

I think the patriots will be pardoned because it's in the best interest of the NFL to put this behind them.

If I'm completely honest...I don't care about the ever so slightly deflated balls. I just wish that they didn't feel that they had to bend/break rules when they are already arguably the best franchise of my life time.

We still don't know what actually happened. Yet most people jump to the conclusion that they intentionally cheated. That's one possibility, among a host of others. That's the problem. This whole, "guilty until proven innocent" mantra the media is pushing on everyone. What about the latest reports that the Colts may have tampered with the ONE ball that was under inflated? The ONE ball they had possession of. Does that report not support people's agenda to prove the Patriots are cheaters? Anything less than a conviction won't be acceptable? That's what it seems like to me. The public has already made up their minds, due to "false" information they have been fed. There's no turning back now, regardless of what happens. Doesn't seem right to me.

Honestly, I listen to sports radio and pay attention to the sports news on a regular basis here in Chicago, and I've heard nothing about the whole one ball thing. Maybe I just missed it, but I have not heard anything about it.

#4969 Re: The Garden » Super Bowl 49 » 610 weeks ago

Axlin12 wrote:

What... in... the... fuck... was Pete Carroll thinking?



EPIC FAIL of the year 2015

I couldn't disagree with you anymore. Can't we chalk it up to the amazing coaching staff and the level of preparedness that that particular player had to be in that spot at that time? The only way that play ends in an interception is if the defender knows exactly what the play is before the play begins. The only way that that player knows that is that they are properly prepared by coaches.

Beyond all of that, if you still think it's wise to call a run play when the defense is in goal line formation and they have at least five huge bodies on the defensive line then I don't think you understand football very well. In addition to that, Seattle put out three wide receivers which means at least one WR will be covered by a linebacker. That's a massive miss match that Seattle should have been able to take advantage of.  That being said, with them only been 1 yard away from the goal line I would probably have called a run in that situation, but I'm sitting on my couch watching the Super Bowl from 1000 miles away. No one is asking me my opinion.

#4970 Re: The Garden » Super Bowl 49 » 611 weeks ago

I think the patriots will be pardoned because it's in the best interest of the NFL to put this behind them.

If I'm completely honest...I don't care about the ever so slightly deflated balls. I just wish that they didn't feel that they had to bend/break rules when they are already arguably the best franchise of my life time.

For the record....I don't criticize the Hawks for the play call either. You should pass when a team is in goal line D and the O has three wide outs.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB