You are not logged in. Please register or login.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
#4801 Re: The Garden » US Politics Thread » 465 weeks ago
I wanna go grab Trumps dick. Just tug it once or twice.
#4802 Re: The Garden » US Politics Thread » 465 weeks ago
Why....
Why did the Republicans go so far out of their way to hate the Clintons? Only to....find the single most disgusting human being...a man who almost makes Bill look like an angel. If you're so bothered by corruption, or sketchy money dealings, or sexual affairs....why in the hell would you ever pick Trump as your representative for president of the US?
#4803 Re: The Garden » US Politics Thread » 466 weeks ago
Trump had an incredible victory Sunday. So awesome in fact that he's plummeted in the polls, handidly lost the debate by viewer polls, lost the support of over 150 republicans, been called out by the party, started a war with the republican speaker of the house and went on a twitter meltdown. Yes, an incredible victory it was!
Best post in this thread in awhile...
#4804 Re: The Garden » US Politics Thread » 466 weeks ago
Cramer wrote:He is setting up excuses for his loss: Not enough support, party turned on him, they are losers and afraid to fight etc.
He will smash the GOP (which is already fractured) into many pieces on his way out too.
Remember when we were talking months ago about Trumpo not really wanting to be president? There are reports he has an entire business plan to run off his loss to make him money. Basically, speaking engagements, speaking fees, merchandise, and I won't be surprised if he starts his own political party that ius the first that requires an NRA type membership fees. It's being reported his inner circle have been laughing at the bad press since the last debate and all the republicans who are going to lose their seats. Trump is the gift that keeps on giving. To the point, I really am wondering if he's trying to destroy the republican party.
He would not be the first to do any of this...he probably would be the most successful. Lots of republican presidential candidates do this...check out Newt Gingrich, Mike Hukabee and Palin. They have no chance of winning the presidency but they ran to increase their public notoriety. They used the primary process as A Publicity measure.
#4805 Re: The Garden » US Politics Thread » 466 weeks ago
What happens if Trump dominates the debate????
What if the Cleveland Browns won the Super Bowl?
It really doesn't matter does it? I bet you declared him the victor of the second debate already. He can do no wrong in your eyes. He is void of criticism as it pertains to you. If he raped a woman you find a way to justify it using this kind of logic.
I'm sick of this. I don't care how corrupt or terrible Hillary is which has far less facts to support it then obviously all of the Donald's, if you want to make your decisions based on propaganda then go right ahead.
If Donald went to the White House and called Obama a nigger and raped Michelle you guys would support it.
I support Hillary even with all of the alleged corruption.
#4806 Re: The Garden » US Politics Thread » 466 weeks ago
bigbri wrote:Smoking Guns wrote:I known you don't believe them but multiple women have accused Bill of freaking rape and sexual assault. What he did to Lewinsky alone gets men fired from their jobs.
Rail on Trump all you want but a man who was elected twice was a serial offender of women and his marriage. Standards don't change just because he's on your team member.
fortunately, we know about Trump before the election. We didn't know about Bill beforehand. Besides, last i checked he isn't running.
He fucked one in the Oval Office. WTF.
The problem I had with all that is the conservative hypocrisy - Newt Gingrich led the charge against Bill in the mid 90s claiming moral high ground and he's just as big a piece of shit as anyone.
At the end of the day, it's nothing more than an attempt by conservatives to gain political points. Newt and Bill were the same. Now we now Donald belongs in the same group.
Let me get, the Trump apologist in you is about to come.
It's pathetic that all Donald can do in his own defense is to say, "Bill and Hillary did much worse." The logic being all bad behavior is justified because the Clintons also did it.
Donald Trump is a disgusting human being.
#4807 Re: The Garden » US Politics Thread » 466 weeks ago
This shit is getting hard to follow.
#4808 Re: The Garden » US Politics Thread » 467 weeks ago
^
Think a lot with your dicks I see....
I think these two candidates tell us a lot about the US population in 2016. I think they represent this country's shithead population quite well.
We're looking into a mirror as a country and we don't like what we see, I guess. Let's face it, this country from its inception was predicated on making money. That's all anyone ever cared about.
Since the 1980s and the great Reagan policies, there is absolutely nothing guiding that ship except money and its interests. Both Trump and Hillary have taken advantage of these policies. Maybe Hillary is every bit as corrupt as some say she is....I have no idea what makes anyone think Trump would want to do anything about it. They both personally benefit from the way things are....
Trump appeals to men, white men especially....I think that says a lot about white men too.
America: Hooray for me and fuck you!
#4809 Re: The Garden » 2016 Presidential Election Thread » 467 weeks ago
You're not giving facts asshat. You're ignoring facts. This is how you play, and this is how I've continued to shut you down to the point you were crying and weren't going to post anymore a month ago. Nothing has changed as I've sat quiet. You still spew bullshit as fact, you bully people that disagree with you, and you have this false narrative of how much you know about politics. You don't know shit dude, because if you did, you'd be agreeing with my assessment.
Good day.
I was censored for using a mans words against him....but this ass hat can froth at the mouth and directly insult people with no consequence?
Wtf is going on here? Hypocrisy....
#4810 Re: The Garden » 2016 Presidential Election Thread » 468 weeks ago
AtariLegend wrote:polluxlm wrote:Will be seeing it tonight, expecting nothing special from either one. From what I hear Trump came away not bad considering the moderator was a democrat, but of course we all knew it would be biased going in. If that's accurate and Hillary failed to demolish Trump under those conditions, I'd say she sort of lost.
MRC’s Brent Bozell: Trump Should ‘Raise Hell’ Over Lester Holt Lobbing ‘Softballs’ to Hillary ‘All Night’
After issuing a statement late Monday night blasting Lester Holt’s job as presidential debate moderator, Media Research Center president Brent Bozell joined the Fox Business Network’s late-night coverage and urged Donald Trump to “raise hell” over Holt “pitch[ing] softballs to Hillary Clinton all night long.”
Host Neil Cavuto turned to Bozell around the 12:48 a.m. Eastern mark for his thoughts on Holt and Bozell promptly went to his “scorecard” on Holt’s relentless hardballs and follow-ups to Trump versus those to Clinton.
On birtherism, stop and frisk, and taxes, Bozell noted that Holt asked Trump about these issues but immediately “challenged him on his answer” and then “challenged, interrupted, or fact-checked him six different times” about whether Trump backed the invasion of Iraq.
pollux do you ever do research on the sites you post news from?
I noticed a theme from most of the sites you've listed in this thread. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Media_Research_Center
Seems strange for someone concerned about conspiracy theories.
Does Holt have a preference? Probably, but to say it shone through and Trump was hard done is a bit of a stretch.
I post from all kinds of sites, but obviously I will find more stuff I like on the fringe.
This particular story I have a pretty strong gut feeling will be quite accurate, so I'll go with that over any "expert" opinions.
If it shone throgh I have no idea, I expect not too much since they are good at what they do. But from what I'm hearing the numbers were pretty stacked in her favor. Several tough questions for Trump with follow ups, one for her with no follow up. A few interruptions of her, much more for Trump, letting the crowd cheer her several times, but told them to stop when it was Trump. If that's what happened I'd call the bias objectively pretty strong.
Lester Holt is a registered Republican. Has been since 2003.
Is that like when Robert Byrd decided not to be a racist anymore?
As I said, haven't seen it yet so I can't comment personally, but if this wasn't a biased debate I'll donate $ 100 to Hillary Clinton.
The scorpion bit the turtle because it was in his nature. The nature of the MSM is not to be objective and informative, that I learned some time ago.
How is it biased? I don't get it...they allowed Trump to rant and rave and redirect the questions all he wanted.
It's just so typical of the Trump base...if you don't win, it's the rule's fault. Let's change the rules so that they are more "fair." Well then what's fair??
You know what....forget it...just create your own facts and live in your alternate reality where the narrative and the evidence always fit so perfectly.
If Trump looked bad last night, it's because he isn't good at this...but everyone has always had to participate in the debates regardless of whether it was a strength or not....
Trump should just quit the debates and make up his own reals....the rabid will always feed into that...
