You are not logged in. Please register or login.

#4771 Re: The Garden » US Politics Thread » 463 weeks ago

James Lofton wrote:
mitchejw wrote:
James Lofton wrote:

No shit. I don't want to hear anymore faux outrage coming from Mitch on this subject.

It's so fitting for it to go in this direction.




So Hillary likes rigging elections? Why am I not shocked? Her comments about Russia meddling were very disingenuous.

I've had 5-6 comments on this thread since you last chimed in....is that all you got?

Faux outrage?

Are you a walking echo chamber ?

Funny how you had nothing to say to my other comments on this thread since Thursday.

I'm here....brung it.

You've ignored my few posts directed at you the past 20 pages or so but now you're spewing this horse shit?

I "brung it" awhile back.

All you're doing is flinging partisan hack garbage and the majority of your posts are trying to bait certain members here. The others here on your 'side' can at least debate the issues intelligently and make their points without the use of troll bait.

I was serious about the racism nonsense. You've labeled others here as racist during this election and then your true colors finally show through. You can either drop it or get flushed. I don't care which door you pick.

I don't see you directly addressing me or making any points worth the addressing. I've been reading your posts here for almost a decade. You haven't said anything new in a decade.

I posted many thoughtful things about Reagan's presidency that you never said anything about. You only pay  attention  to the people who agree with you and that's fine. But you and your definition of racism seems to only apply to you.

As a white man from the shit state of Wisconsin, I hate Wisconsin  in that it appears to have turned into a place where people hate each other.  I hate the simplemindedness.  All I ask is for someone to say something thoughtful.

I am not sure what dump it or flush it or whatever that turn a phrase was that you just used but do what you Gotta do buddy.  I will not be intimidated by the bullshit of somebody who thinks like it is still the 19th century.

There are no more issues to debate.  This thread is entirely circular. We have the same conversation over and over and forgive me if they bore me to shit.

#4772 Re: The Garden » US Politics Thread » 463 weeks ago

James Lofton wrote:
Smoking Guns wrote:
mitchejw wrote:

Wow what a sour response. I wrote that in about seven minutes on the toilet this morning.

While I may not be funny, I know about the electoral college. I know  that the Republicans have all the shit states that only have three electoral votes to pledge. If they're not three electoral votes little more than 4 or 5 electoral. college votes.

What's so difficult to understand about that? States Like North Dakota and South Dakota and Wyoming and Idaho and Montana. You know, all those inbred white states  that nobody lives in or wants to live in .

Pretty racist comment.

No shit. I don't want to hear anymore faux outrage coming from Mitch on this subject.

Smoking Guns wrote:

They were investigating Weiner and his texting of an underage girl and found the classified emails on his fucking phone. Holy shit.

It's so fitting for it to go in this direction.




So Hillary likes rigging elections? Why am I not shocked? Her comments about Russia meddling were very disingenuous.

I've had 5-6 comments on this thread since you last chimed in....is that all you got?

Faux outrage?

Are you a walking echo chamber ?

Funny how you had nothing to say to my other comments on this thread since Thursday.

I'm here....brung it.

#4773 Re: The Garden » US Politics Thread » 463 weeks ago

This is the perfect analysis for this thread: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xdOnfvzSMwE

James E. Cornette has a way with words.

#4774 Re: The Garden » US Politics Thread » 463 weeks ago

bigbri wrote:
Randall Flagg wrote:
AtariLegend wrote:

In the unlikely scenario it was 269-269, who do people assume the House would pick?

Sleazy Paul Ryan, Ted Cruz, another Republican or do would they just go with Trump?

The constitution says congress can only vote on the 3 candidates with highest amount of EVs. Since only 2 will get any EVs, it'd be between Trump and Clinton. They'd probably still vote in Trump.


Imagine if McMullin won Utah and the House picked him.

Actually, was it fighting Bob Lafollete from my home state of Wisconsin? Man, would he be rolling over in his grave if he could see what Scott Walker has done to the state.

#4775 Re: The Garden » US Politics Thread » 463 weeks ago

bigbri wrote:
Randall Flagg wrote:
AtariLegend wrote:

In the unlikely scenario it was 269-269, who do people assume the House would pick?

Sleazy Paul Ryan, Ted Cruz, another Republican or do would they just go with Trump?

The constitution says congress can only vote on the 3 candidates with highest amount of EVs. Since only 2 will get any EVs, it'd be between Trump and Clinton. They'd probably still vote in Trump.


Imagine if McMullin won Utah and the House picked him.

Who was the last third party candidate to win EVs, was it Eugene Debs? (Spelling may be off).

#4776 Re: The Garden » US Politics Thread » 463 weeks ago

Randall Flagg wrote:
mitchejw wrote:
James Lofton wrote:

If you pulled that from the Onion it's their worst article ever. The least they could do is learn the basics of the electoral college.

Wow what a sour response. I wrote that in about seven minutes on the toilet this morning.

While I may not be funny, I know about the electoral college. I know  that the Republicans have all the shit states that only have three electoral votes to pledge. If they're not three electoral votes little more than 4 or 5 electoral. college votes.

What's so difficult to understand about that? States Like North Dakota and South Dakota and Wyoming and Idaho and Montana. You know, all those inbred white states  that nobody lives in or wants to live in .


Have you ever left Chicago?  Met the people that create all the food and shit no one in your city is willing/capable to make?  Montana and Wyoming are gorgeous. They lack the urban component that makes Chicago the deadliest city in the country. I'll take a week on a ranch in Montana every time over a week in Chicago staring at concrete and paying 2x as much for mediocre food.

I remember The uniroyal factory in Eau Claire Wisconsin shut down. 1992 I believe...I was 10.

My elementary school was just across the Eau Claire river from the factory  that employed hundreds if not thousands of Eau Claire citizens.  i used to see the mini smokestacks billowing on recess.

Believe it or not this is actually before NAFTA. Cant go blaming Bill for that right? You'll try though.

Yeah I've seen small-town USA.

#4777 Re: The Garden » US Politics Thread » 463 weeks ago

Smoking Guns wrote:
mitchejw wrote:
James Lofton wrote:

If you pulled that from the Onion it's their worst article ever. The least they could do is learn the basics of the electoral college.

Wow what a sour response. I wrote that in about seven minutes on the toilet this morning.

While I may not be funny, I know about the electoral college. I know  that the Republicans have all the shit states that only have three electoral votes to pledge. If they're not three electoral votes little more than 4 or 5 electoral. college votes.

What's so difficult to understand about that? States Like North Dakota and South Dakota and Wyoming and Idaho and Montana. You know, all those inbred white states  that nobody lives in or wants to live in .

Pretty racist comment. "Shit states", no wonder our country is divided. Not everyone can live in NYC, Boston, Chicago, Detroit, LA, San Francisco.

About the polls, please take out the USA Today and ABC poll. They are severely flawed and asked a majority Democratic group. So not accurate. Take those polls out and the one where trump is winning and you are in that 3-5 range I assume.

No....just no....

First of all, you should probably hate subsidies for farms mr. conservative.

I am a white man who doesn't care for most white men....that I will own.

#4778 Re: The Garden » US Politics Thread » 463 weeks ago

Smoking Guns wrote:
mitchejw wrote:
James Lofton wrote:

If you pulled that from the Onion it's their worst article ever. The least they could do is learn the basics of the electoral college.

Wow what a sour response. I wrote that in about seven minutes on the toilet this morning.

While I may not be funny, I know about the electoral college. I know  that the Republicans have all the shit states that only have three electoral votes to pledge. If they're not three electoral votes little more than 4 or 5 electoral. college votes.

What's so difficult to understand about that? States Like North Dakota and South Dakota and Wyoming and Idaho and Montana. You know, all those inbred white states  that nobody lives in or wants to live in .

Pretty racist comment. "Shit states", no wonder our country is divided. Not everyone can live in NYC, Boston, Chicago, Detroit, LA, San Francisco.

About the polls, please take out the USA Today and ABC poll. They are severely flawed and asked a majority Democratic group. So not accurate. Take those polls out and the one where trump is winning and you are in that 3-5 range I assume.

No....just no....

First of all, you should probably hate subsidies for farms mr. conservative.

I am a white man who doesn't care for most white men....that I will own.

#4779 Re: The Garden » US Politics Thread » 463 weeks ago

Randall Flagg wrote:
mitchejw wrote:
James Lofton wrote:

If you pulled that from the Onion it's their worst article ever. The least they could do is learn the basics of the electoral college.

Wow what a sour response. I wrote that in about seven minutes on the toilet this morning.

While I may not be funny, I know about the electoral college. I know  that the Republicans have all the shit states that only have three electoral votes to pledge. If they're not three electoral votes little more than 4 or 5 electoral. college votes.

What's so difficult to understand about that? States Like North Dakota and South Dakota and Wyoming and Idaho and Montana. You know, all those inbred white states  that nobody lives in or wants to live in .


Have you ever left Chicago?  Met the people that create all the food and shit no one in your city is willing/capable to make?  Montana and Wyoming are gorgeous. They lack the urban component that makes Chicago the deadliest city in the country. I'll take a week on a ranch in Montana every time over a week in Chicago staring at concrete and paying 2x as much for mediocre food.

Haha bad food? Lost all credibility there.

I'm originally from northern Wisconsin....I've actually been on many a farm...not talented enough to contribute in any way though.

Eau Claire, WI to be exact. Spent time in Rice Lake and a bit in Rhinelander - also Shawno which is an Indian reservation.

You want to talk about beauty? Then all of those places beat Illinois.

#4780 Re: The Garden » US Politics Thread » 463 weeks ago

James Lofton wrote:

If you pulled that from the Onion it's their worst article ever. The least they could do is learn the basics of the electoral college.

Wow what a sour response. I wrote that in about seven minutes on the toilet this morning.

While I may not be funny, I know about the electoral college. I know  that the Republicans have all the shit states that only have three electoral votes to pledge. If they're not three electoral votes little more than 4 or 5 electoral. college votes.

What's so difficult to understand about that? States Like North Dakota and South Dakota and Wyoming and Idaho and Montana. You know, all those inbred white states  that nobody lives in or wants to live in .

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB