mitchejw wrote:

Randall Flagg wrote:

Your party's entire platform is predicated on race and identifying arbitrary differences to make people "special".   You come in this forum and post some sob story about an exchange student who may or may not have been harmed because of his ethnicity.  But remain absolutely mum when 30 people of color are butchered in your own city every week.  You guys try to claim we can't define your silence, but we don't need to.  What you feel obligated to comment on is a direct line into what you find important.   The hypocrisy and double standards to which you feign moral outrage says it all. 

Your party doesn't give a fuck about poor whites in Appalachia.  Jim Webb brought this up in the first primary debate and was mocked for it.  The war on poverty has resulted in your adopted community having a less than 50% high school graduation rate and 70% out of wedlock births - more than any other demographic.  So yes, you're not interested in actual results in policy, but what aligns with your unqualified white guilt.  Your party has accomplished nothing but celebrating ignorance and keeping those least advantaged enslaved to government assistance programs.  If people of color can't achieve equality on their merits and achievements alone, then maybe it's time they abandon the moronic belief systems that tell them they can live free of consequence?

It's not the party that showed me the "differences" between people. You can call the differences "arbitrary" if you want to....but whatever. You speak in the abstract and you keep trying to put me in the position of defending your inferences.

Your idea that this country should solely be filled with war mongering assholes who only seem to validated if they're killing someone of another country/culture/belief system/color sounds a lot like all the countries that you ridicule. Are you in support of Russia's efforts to take over countries that surround them? It seems like you should be....the superior Russia waving its dick around as they take the weak, inferior and probably faggy liberal countries who are just not strong enough to defend themselves seems like something you should support.

EXCEPT....this is the perfect time for 'Murica to take its shirt off, take out it's gun and blow back Russia into its inferior status from 'Murica....thus once again proving the cycle of life....the whole macho manly system is predicated on every backing down to the all mighty 'Murica. But that faggy, pussy Obama decided that a war on the other side of the world over ideas of machismo and 'Muricain made ideas of....well....'Murican superiority and flexing muscles and shootin' guns n' stuff. Sounds like that long, grueling, little skirmish that went on between 1960 to 1975....real succesful venture for us....just like operation Iraqi freedom. There was a whole country of people DEPENDENT on the government to establish/maintain FREEEEEEDOM!!!! Sounds like a buncha pussy fuckin' liberals if you ask me...

YEEEEEE HAWWW!!!!

Are you done with story time?  I believe in everyone working together and playing by the rules.  If you want western technology and want access to our markets, play by our rules.   If you act up like Sadam and threaten stability, you get smacked.  That doesn't mean you enter our countries and declare them yours now.  That's threatening the stability.  It's called putting a line in the sand and sending military assets to stand their ground.  I don't want to go to war with anyone.  Been there, done that.  It's not fun.  But you forget that this wonderful society didn't just manifest itself into existence.  Our grandfathers and great grandfathers built this country and made it the superpower it is today.  They sacrificed for it.  Men and women sacrifice for it today by volunteering to suit up and go wherever their country tells them to go so other people know it's not okay to come here and knock down and take what we've built.  Men and women are creating business and new ideas that better our society.  Everyone else is just a bystander taking advantage of what the others have sacrificed to maintain.  Where do you fit in to the equation?

You come across as someone who's never taken a stand for anything or ever stood up for yourself. Did the jocks flick you in the ear and call you a 'faggot'? At least that's what I hear when you automatically assume every military action is a dick measuring contest.   Some jocks flicked me in the ear and called me a 'faggot' too.  But I smacked them in the mouth and they all of a sudden weren't as bold.  I'm not saying nor have I ever advocated a military response to every infraction.  But Chirst, if you're not willing to get smacked in the mouth when someone is trying to come in your house and fuck your wife, when is it appropriate?