You are not logged in. Please register or login.

#401 Re: Guns N' Roses » i'm back » 831 weeks ago

The MIA analogy is horrible. MIA and her management are shrewd, efficient, and professional. Axl...is not these things.

#402 Re: Guns N' Roses » i'm back » 831 weeks ago

monkeychow wrote:
Axlin08 wrote:

This is how the game is played, Axl wanted it to be this way.

I assume by that you mean that you think it's his fault for not releasing more material faster. Because, in my opinion, while new music is great for fans, I would expect that the band sees leaks as harmful or at a minimum frustrating. Artisticly to the band they're unfinsihed, and while the band may drag its feet comercially, I don't think it helps to give out the album free in advance.

To be honest i see these leaks as a double edge sword. Axl is my favourite singer ever - so i'd kill to hear anything new - but at the same time i think it sucks that his albums are getting ruined in this way.

I know many will say its his own fault for not releasing earlier. But it's  still fucked on some level. Sure the 06 leaks sustained many of us and kept our interest - but I also think listening to Chinese Democracy in 2008 without having ever heard any leak would have been totally mindblowing....i feel some of these antics steal the thunder of the band....

Well, its not like he waited until the time was right or the album was complete -- just look at the shit rush job of the booklet and promotion.

Something/someone forced his hand. At this point MSL, Skwerl, etc might be the only reason we hear new music, or got Chinese Democracy in the first place.

#403 Re: Guns N' Roses » i'm back » 831 weeks ago

russtcb wrote:
strat0 wrote:

I can tell you for a fact that Checkmate is in several of our very own forum member's possesion and will be heard "soon" by all, according to my source.

In addition, the Chinese D masters AND the often discussed, but never leaked, backstage 2002 VMA footage will FINALLY see the light of day.

We may not get a tour in 2009, but we will certainly have a few new goodies to enjoy and discuss.

STAY TUNED!

What are the "Chinese D masters"? Hopefully not just different mixes of the album?

They're the separate instrumental master tracks from the Rock Band 2 disc. You'll be able to hear only the bass in better, for example

#404 Re: Guns N' Roses » i'm back » 831 weeks ago

AWESOME. Which board was that from?

#405 Re: Guns N' Roses » i'm back » 831 weeks ago

When Shackler's leaked, people were actually permitted to talk about it on the largest site. Then, when the record leaked a couple weeks before launch, no mention of the songs was permitted at all.

Not that the site was perfect, threads about Axl's hair and pirate dance moves were embarrassing to all GnR fans (which is often something you already don't want to mention in public), but the mods did a total 180 in mid-November.

#406 Re: Guns N' Roses » i'm back » 831 weeks ago

Yes, they do. They didn't use to. They aren't doing it out of "respect for the band," or fear of legal action, they want to get "exclusive" stuff from management, or to get meaningless "merry christmas" calls from Axl. Fucking fanboys.

That funny youtube video making fun of Jarmo can now be applied to almost all the gnr boards out there.

It's just mega lame to disrespect the fans because of the request of a dysfunction band that can't be bothered to throw their most hardcore fans a bone.

When "unofficial" boards become mouthpieces and arms for management, what is the point of being in a censored community?

#407 Re: Guns N' Roses » i'm back » 831 weeks ago

The topic or board you are looking for appears to be either missing or off limits to you.
Please login below or register an account with Guns N Roses Chinese Democracy Dot Com Forum.

#408 Re: Guns N' Roses » i'm back » 831 weeks ago

I don't see it there anymore. Taken down that fast?

We should compile a list of sites that don't have Beta's hand up their puppethole.

I understand wanting to avoid legal liability (although sites being held liable for content posted by others is still a dubious legal gray area), but quashing discussion? That's for the birds.

#409 Re: Guns N' Roses » i'm back » 831 weeks ago

holy shit. i cant wait.

even better, "Leaks" is plural. big_smile

#410 Re: Guns N' Roses » Oh My God » 831 weeks ago

Axlin08 wrote:

I think the overall end point, is you'd be hard pressed to find a 'bad' Guns N' Roses song. I think that's why we all love this band.

The best part is that people pretend that My World doesn't even exist anymore, lol.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB