You are not logged in. Please register or login.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
#341 Re: Guns N' Roses » anyone hear the atlas clip leak » 378 weeks ago
Classic Rock in 2007 confirmed Atlas Shrugged has/had Brian May on it
Jeff Leeds of NY Times mentioned Atlas Shrugged in 2006 and said it as a cross between 1970s rock and November Rain (more to do with the song structure than the length)
#342 Re: Guns N' Roses » sp1at thread » 378 weeks ago
misterID wrote:I would bet you anything the only producers on Better were Axl and Caram. Perhaps Sean was there at its conception, but that's probably about it. I haven't seen anything that says RTB did jack in recording any new music.
RTB handled, at first, the re-recording of the Sean Beavan '99 album. It was a different beast altogether, Axl'd recorded it at Rumbo Recorders, and i doubt it's a coincidence that one other album called Appetite was done there, too. He was after that certain AFD vibe from the get-go, with the band recording an entire cover album - quite possibly even in the same studio space!
The Beavan album was apparently mastered, btw. Sp1at alumni gigger had an email exchange with the late mastering engineer George Marino and he said he did it back in the day (99/00). To me, that's the real Chinese Democracy, all the Brain/Bucket stuff et al should've been natural progression in lieu of a follow-up.
"I think [Interscope head Jimmy] Iovine put Roy Thomas Baker in the producer seat because he didn’t think the raw sounds were good enough. Then Roy came in and would try every Marshall guitar amp in a five-state area to find just the right guitar tone. And he wanted to do that for every single part on the album." (Tommy, 04/09)
""They had recorded a bunch of stuff and Josh Freese had recorded a lot of stuff. I think he recorded 90% of the drumming on the 25-30 tunes that were floating around. When I came it was right when they got [producer] Roy Thomas Baker. He was coming from Queen, The Cars, Journey, more the rock thing. He said we had to go re-record the drums because they sounded very industrial." (Brain, 10/12)
"Roy Thomas Baker drove us around L.A. in his Rolls Royce to try to find the exact drums that we wanted for the recording. We went to every company, and it wound up being a mash-up of all the best drums we could find around L.A. We pretty much gathered the most ridiculous kit you could ever have, to re-record Josh’s parts." (Brain, 03/09)
"There was no time constraints, there was nothing. I don’t think anybody was keeping track of it. I was going, ‘I don’t know who’s paying for this, or what’s going on but I don’t really care because I get to come here and f*** off in one of the best studios in the world with some of the best drums and some of the best recording gear, everybody talks s*** about Axl and Guns N Roses but this is killer for me!’" (Brain, 10/12)
In other words, RTB had set his gaze on the sound of the band and was poised to change it by shuffling them through all that gear. The aggravated spending would've come up at this point. The Bob Ezrin / RTB period saw them move to Village Recorders, and set Brain's drumkit in the attic for the next five years. There's the story about the '59 Les Paul having been rented and forgotten in a corner for a couple of years. There was no floor-level management looking after things, as RTB was just thrilled to have the gig, just like anyone else. They could always invent new things to 'improve' the record; Axl needed to be the one to say, 'Now it's good.'
Of course, RTB's work was eventually scrapped and the album was re-recorded for the third time with Axl and Constanzo producing. There were songs added in during RTB's time (Shackler, Sorry...), but also afterwards with Better, et al.
misterID wrote:I have serious doubts there's some big Lebeis conspiracy preventing a reunion.
I always felt the low point was Beta threatening to 'quit' (what? Her role in Axl's life) in an LA Times article should the band get professional representation after post-Azoff managers Doc McGhee and, later on, Peter Katsis were shown the door. Azoff, the record company and other parties with financial interests over Guns were more keen on the reunion idea than Axl, and based on what people like MSL and Marc Canter have said about Beta, her opinion on Slash seems aligned with that of Axl's, in that Slash's cancer. The silly part in all that is, obviously, that Axl and Slash don't need to do business together to rekindle their friendship.
Just adding to the ongoing saga, there was a 99/00 master. Marino did it, see above
Sorry to resurrect a old thread
#343 Re: Guns N' Roses » Will new music be released in 2019? » 379 weeks ago
I was expecting one new track this year, but I have not been able to find anything.
We'll know soon either way
#344 Re: Guns N' Roses » 2019 tour date announced » 380 weeks ago
A couple of interviewers also said that, off the record, Duff and Slash have both stated that there might be new material before the end of the year, but in a flippant manner.
#345 Re: Guns N' Roses » 2019 tour date announced » 380 weeks ago
sp1at wrote:Looks like a tour cycle might begin in April next year
Oh jeez another tour?!
![]()
I will say, the article rumors a possible UYI set in its entirety. While AFD would be more in demand, UYI would be quite an achievement playing some of those classics & sagas.
I asked about it, and all I was told is that the article reflects what the promoter was told. So I am guessing, a new album is the plan, but they have a Plan B in place if it is not ready.
It fits in with what have been said before
#346 Re: Guns N' Roses » 2019 tour date announced » 381 weeks ago
Just going on the various interviews alone, I would be hoping for a new album and tour. Axl and Caram are obviously busy with something in the studio, and an album wouldn't take that long to finish up and release.
The other option would be a novelty tour allowing them time to finish a new album, but if they do this, Slash'll probably go off and start another Conspirators record, as per one of his interviews, and this would cause further delays
I think working on another album whilst continuing the current tour would be incredibly nonsensical. The NITL tour has gone on a long time, and I can understand this from a financial perspective as it gives everyone that nest egg, and the record company money from merch. But no tour lasts longer than three/four years. Roger Waters and Garth Brooks did four year tours, U2 and the Rolling Stones have done three years tours, but that is the maximum shelf life of any tour.
#347 Re: Guns N' Roses » 2019 tour date announced » 382 weeks ago
Looks like a tour cycle might begin in April next year
#348 Re: Guns N' Roses » Will new music be released in 2019? » 383 weeks ago
What they said.
As I have said previously, switch off until the second half of November, then we'll take a poke about. Nothing happening until then
#349 Re: Guns N' Roses » 2019 tour date announced » 390 weeks ago
sp1at wrote:April ya see. Take what they are saying with a pinch of salt. Recording has happened, and is happening.
Obviously, the band don't have a good track record, but at least the intention is there for now
So what exactly is that meant to mean...? Are they NOT recording new Guns music?
New material is being worked on.
#350 Re: Guns N' Roses » 2019 tour date announced » 391 weeks ago
April ya see. Take what they are saying with a pinch of salt. Recording has happened, and is happening.
Obviously, the band don't have a good track record, but at least the intention is there for now
