You are not logged in. Please register or login.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
#21 Re: Guns N' Roses » Chinese Democracy Liner Note Discussions *EXTREME SPOILERS* » 868 weeks ago
elevendayempire wrote:It's interesting to think that you could stick the 90s demo versions of IRS and TWAT together with Prostitute and This I Love, bulk it out with the better tracks from It's Five O'Clock Somewhere and you'd basically have the 96 GNR album...
And it's not even a stretch.
Snakepit is essentially a collection of Slash's GNR songs. Strip the orchestral arrangements from Prostitute and you'll get a very bare-bones ballad in the four-minute margin, albeit with an aggressive rhythm section.
In that sense, the 96 album would've been a definite step down from the produced-to-death UYI's. However, almost anything would've been viewed that way at the time. A more heartfelt, mature version of AFD in some ways. Had the band stuck together, it would've no doubt been viewed as a stop-gap release.
Pearl Jam was falling with No Code, while Marilyn Manson's Antichrist Superstar and Korn's Life is Peachy would lay the groundwork for the rest of the decade as far as nu-metal would be viewed - and there's a door I doubt GNR would've ever dared to open. GNR, if coming out with an album in '97, might've found some audiences from the alternative scene, the Radiohead/Faith No More crowds. Most of their former peers had sufficed to release collections, so it was generally going to be an uphill battle no matter what.
The ways the recording process in '96 has been described by Slash, Ax and others, Ax's leaning towards alternative metal seems to fit the bell. He did want to change the direction of the band; his seemingly obvious choice would've therefore been to introduce the bluesy hard rock sound of GNR into alternative; the hardest, loudest straight-up guitar album they could've made. That would've carved GNR a whole new niche in the genre and they might've survived in some form, even though world domination would've hopelessly fallen beyond the reach.
Some people would've obviously picked the band on deserting their roots and going with the flow, others would've noted how they'd be trying so hard to metamorphose into something new that it's not enjoyable anymore. Of course, some would've liked it, but I doubt that in the long run it would've been considered much more than one of those albums established acts push out every now and then.
Basically, it would've been about justifying their existence during the interim.
Well though-out post and I see your point. In a way they left while still being one of the biggest bands of the world and skipped the whole downtime in the industry when things went into chaos eventually leading us to the Disney stars taking over (Britney etc...) They are coming back at a time when the industry is changing again and that may, in fact, work out well for the long-term legacy of GNR (to have been dormant during that time) We'll see....
#22 Re: Guns N' Roses » Chinese Democracy Liner Note Discussions *EXTREME SPOILERS* » 868 weeks ago
PM please!
#23 Re: Guns N' Roses » (OLD NEWS!)The Limewire Leaks Discussion » 869 weeks ago
mcalldp wrote:Agreed! er....except maybe the beginning to scraped! (bad bad bad)
yeah i can't help but laugh at that one too. oh well...its axl
Maybe we can do a fan remix of that section to change it up a bit
#24 Re: Guns N' Roses » Moved due to album details revealed. » 869 weeks ago
Yea, Live- you do seem nice enough but it's just aggravating to posters on forums when discussions are moderated to the point of deleting content selectively. If I want to talk about leaks I can do that here, this shows that this site is more in line with my stance on the freedom we should have in discussions areas.
But- that's my opinion and I am not going to any other sites and being an ass, I've just decided to no longer participate at some places and to now make this my home; I know others feel the same way but live and let live I guess.
#25 Re: Guns N' Roses » (OLD NEWS!)The Limewire Leaks Discussion » 869 weeks ago
Agreed! er....except maybe the beginning to scraped! (bad bad bad)
#26 Re: Guns N' Roses » Moved due to album details revealed. » 869 weeks ago
At this time, this is the only discussion board that allows fully free discussion. I just defected from mygnr after years of being there due to so many thread deletions leading to total lock-down of entire subjects, and don't get me started on HTGTH(!)
I am so happy to have found this spot and while I might not have been as strongly worded as the above post towards this guy, I can't really find myself feeling bad either. If you can't even discuss information on your site yet you have exclusive details yourself and you're happy to distribute that on another site....
Well, can't you see that you've just enjoyed the freedom here that you deny in your own board? No thanks, the only thing I would like to see banned here is admins from other sites, -bye bye now-
#27 Re: Guns N' Roses » When will it leak? *It Leaked* » 869 weeks ago
Agreed these other boards that have for a while or are just now starting to kill off threads, ban people, lock discussions, it's horrible. The whole point of a forum is the freedom to talk- I spent a few years at mygnr and after finding this board I've defected for the long run now.
#28 Re: Guns N' Roses » (OLD NEWS!)The Limewire Leaks Discussion » 869 weeks ago
I STILL can't find any of them - maybe someone can PM me with more info-?
#29 Re: Guns N' Roses » When will it leak? *It Leaked* » 869 weeks ago
It is strange people not sharing much... I remember being one of the first to host Better on my site and had hundreds download and now between three sites I can't get anyone to PM a brother, wtf? Come on peeps let's help each other out a bit-
#30 Re: Guns N' Roses » (OLD NEWS!)The Limewire Leaks Discussion » 869 weeks ago
Can someone PM me with more information?