You are not logged in. Please register or login.

#262 Re: Guns N' Roses » RRHoF Discussion (Izzy/Slash/Axl Press Statements) » 688 weeks ago

war

whether you are a professional or not - if you are forced to do something your heart is not in to, whether you give it your all or purposely ambush the performance, it will be short of magical.

#263 Re: Guns N' Roses » RRHoF Discussion (Izzy/Slash/Axl Press Statements) » 688 weeks ago

war

lol i can't help think that axl, if reading this

buzzsaw wrote:

giving 100% in the shows, being ready for the tours when they start, mixing things up a bit more on the setlists, making an effort to do something (anything) with the CD sessions music, releasing pro-shot DVDs of the new band to sell how good they are as GnR to the public, writing and recording with the new guys in an effort to move forward, etc.  I don't want all of that for me, but I'd respect him a LOT more if he did it.

would be thinking.....

yeah, and id be a lot more willing to:


release new music if so and so wouldn't fuck it up

be more professional for shows if lame ass security could keep the cameras out

release live dvd's if they wouldn't all be pirated

#264 Re: Guns N' Roses » RRHoF Discussion (Izzy/Slash/Axl Press Statements) » 688 weeks ago

war

we don't print out regular paychecks to axl for regular work. we bought his cd's and for that - we got cd's. we bought his concert tickets - and for that we got concerts. he is rich, yes but we got what we paid for. hell, and then some these days.....with downloading and youtube equaling free boots and what not.

#266 Re: Guns N' Roses » RRHoF Discussion (Izzy/Slash/Axl Press Statements) » 688 weeks ago

war

russ message me your facebook info - if that's alright with you, ofcourse.

#267 Re: Guns N' Roses » RRHoF Discussion (Izzy/Slash/Axl Press Statements) » 688 weeks ago

war
Ali wrote:

One thing to note is that the letter is preface with "everyone who's shown support for my decision regarding the Rock And Roll Hall Of Fame".

Having said that, I don't think Axl is saying that the general response has been positive given that he's addressing this to those that have shown support specifically.  I think it's more likely that he's saying that there has been a surprisingly strong positive response from those that have been supportive.  At least, that's my interpretation given the "To" line.

Ali

maybe ali, but either way, he's not saying the sum of all responses have been predominately positive. he's saying he was expecting less positivity than he received.

#268 Re: Guns N' Roses » RRHoF Discussion (Izzy/Slash/Axl Press Statements) » 688 weeks ago

war

what he's saying, bono, is one facebook your true identity is known making your comments more honest.

#269 Re: Guns N' Roses » RRHoF Discussion (Izzy/Slash/Axl Press Statements) » 688 weeks ago

war
Mikkamakka wrote:
war wrote:
polluxlm wrote:

What the hell is he talking about? He's being ripped by the fans.

well, in general a negative person will complain in the easiest way possible.
someone with an attempt to reach out to axl in this situation may pick up the phone or send an email or message via website, etc. you wouldn't hear about those. the supporters may also go unnoticed because everyone is a hard ass online. having said that, i am sure the overwhelming majority stance is the obvious one.

Jarmo cleared HTGTH then Beta let Axl take a look at the 'fans' comments'.

16

#270 Re: Guns N' Roses » RRHoF Discussion (Izzy/Slash/Axl Press Statements) » 688 weeks ago

war

axl has a "with me or against me" attitude. once old guns became associated with hall or vice versa it became too much for him to deal with internally.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB