You are not logged in. Please register or login.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
#11 Re: Guns N' Roses » Mustache » 12 weeks ago
AgesOfTheIce wrote:Circus Maximus has never been confirmed to be connected to Ides Of March and should not be postulated as such. It's just a theory.
Unless Axl wrote multiple songs based on Ancient Rome it seems to be a good theory.
You might be right, but 2 things;
Remember how we thought Me and My Elvis was Elvis Presley and the Monster of Soul (which was renamed Monsters?) Well clearly it wasn't. Just 2 different tracks that had the words Elvis in the title. Unless it turns out Monsters isn't Soul Monster - which again would further prove the point anyway.
Also the track was supposedly called Ides of March in 98 on conception. I suppose they could have renamed it Circus Maximus in 2000 then changed the back in the early 00s to Ides again, but still... (see chinese whispers].
#12 Re: Guns N' Roses » Monsters V20.25 » 12 weeks ago
For clarity. Monsters is in the same track in better auto quality. I cannot tell any real difference and it is hypothetically possible it was just someone playing around with it.
So not sure what the 20.25 thing is.
Children of the Revolution with the intact outro though is different, cause it actually sounds real and adds something.
Monsters? Well if you heard it before, then you already heard it.
#13 Re: Guns N' Roses » Tracks missing from the leaked CD's » 12 weeks ago
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/G7a0eGsb0AI … name=small
@billbrasky
Did you ever see this image yourself personally before 2019?
#14 Re: Guns N' Roses » Children of the Revolution » 12 weeks ago
Hypothetically both could be fake.
However in the case of COTR, Zak descibed a jam in the 2nd half. I get a few seconds before transaction might sound a bit questionable - however over all it does fit what was given as the description.
A fan could hypothetically fake it, but the natural instincts of fake makers is to go a get bit too far. This sounds about what one might expect with what the music was going for.
I lean towards assuming it's real, but I suppose it could it be faked. More about the original source this comes from, which I assume we won't find out.
Unless it was from the usual suspects?
#15 Re: Guns N' Roses » Children of the Revolution » 12 weeks ago
What's the difference between these and the versions we have already heard?
Revolution has the outro/final third. The original leak cut off before and so the jam to play the song out was missing.
Monsters is a higher quality audio version. I think it's the same mix, just a better file upload. (I THINK).
#16 Re: Guns N' Roses » Children of the Revolution » 12 weeks ago
Monsters just same thing only higher quality file in my ears.
Sounds great, but I couldn't make out any difference on listing other than slightly clearer and louder.
#17 Re: Guns N' Roses » Children of the Revolution » 12 weeks ago
I like COR. Nice to here the complete version. Bit weird though the original leak by Zak pushed version didn't include the outro.
I was expecting a big crazy jam, instead its just a very good extended outro. It is cool, but weird play by Zak to include most of the original track originally.
#18 Re: Guns N' Roses » Children of the Revolution » 12 weeks ago
So this and a new version of Monsters leaked per MYGNR posts?
Would love to know what they sound like.
