You are not logged in. Please register or login.

#11 Re: Guns N' Roses » New Album Thread » 290 weeks ago

wasted wrote:

It does seem like a UYI situation where there’s older material like Back off or Don’t Cry and new songs that Slash will bring in.

It might not be a double cd but if you start putting tracks together like Hardschool, Berlin, The Seeker, Atlas, Perhaps, Soul Monster plus a couple new ones that’s half a cd without trying. With State of Grace, Going Down, Wichita Lineman, Silkworms, Circus and a few new ones - that’s a good mix.

there better be no covers on this new album cause that would just be lazy but yeah Berlin Hardschool Atlas and Soul Monster and maybe Silkworms if it has lyrics reworked could work also with new original material and hopefully as we speak right now Axl Slash and Duff are
in the studio recording and writing it would be a dream come true to see those 3 record a new album after 26 years but really excited for the future cause these boring legs of the NITL probably have stopped by now and by march 2019 they have probably the album to promote and will tour relentlessly for about 2 years then after that who knows?

#12 Re: Guns N' Roses » The Best of Rough Mixes Disc 2, Round 6 » 290 weeks ago

i love sorry and i hate quick song so please people get rid of quick song

#13 Re: Guns N' Roses » Rough Mixes Disc 1 » 290 weeks ago

wasted wrote:

Scraped to me is how they worked Bucket material. It seems like Costanzo and Axl worked some magic on it.

nah it seems caram and axl ruined it with horrible lyrics and horrible editing by caram. bucket and brain are what that song great instrumentally

#14 Re: Guns N' Roses » Rough Mixes Disc 1 » 290 weeks ago

AtariLegend wrote:
FlashFlood wrote:

I’m fascinated by what it was about the songs that Axl recorded vocals for and the ones that (at this point in time) were left instrumental. Like, what was it about Scraped that made him want to record vocals on vs. Quick Song, Soul Monster (later recorded), Prom Violence etc.

Pretty sure Soul Monster/Leave Me Alone did get vocals.

Why was it not on the album? Wasn't leaked.

Not sure on Prom Violence, but what's on these discs and what we heard weren't the only finished tracks.

We know Oklahoma was finished and if you believe msl... (tonto was too).

The General and others.

The album is basically just a collection of leaks that had been circulating for years with a few other tracks added to make up the numbers... to get it over with and leave room for another album. It's a real shame.

Of course it's highly likely a Dub Suplex never got finished, but for perspective... we never knew Perhaps or State of Grace even existed. These are tracks from the late 90s mixed in 2000. Not even a reference to them in interviews or articles ect.

isn't leave me alone from the 95 izzy sessions? and i hate to throw out theories but i think duff is on oklahoma. and we already did know about perhaps when msl gave us the 2010 album track listing along with tonto so it looks like the 2010 album was probably gonna be called 2010 intentions

#15 Re: Guns N' Roses » Tracks missing from the leaked CD's » 290 weeks ago

James wrote:
elevendayempire wrote:
Declan94 wrote:

19 cds very hard to put them in an exact order but every cd from the chinese era locker leaked

Bloody hell. Didn't realise it had all leaked. PM, anyone?

Are you sure you don't have it all and it all just blended together?

I mean...you have the discs that were the last to leak(Rough Mixes).

Here's a pic of the discs....

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/ … e-List.jpg



benny wrote:

Eulogy of a Broken Heart was another rumored song title back in 2005/2006.  It was supposed to be a November Rain style song.

I'm in that old camp who believed this was a working title for Better.

i first heard of the title "Better" in 2004 when a hoarder came on one of the forums around october 2004 saying he had songs called "TWAT" "Better" and "IRS" and no one believed him until early early 2006 when they leaked. The gnr world is one strange world

#16 Re: Guns N' Roses » New Album Thread » 290 weeks ago

James wrote:

Even if the EP thing wound up being the case, I'd still be happy with it I suppose....same with a Hell Freezes Over type release.

As long as something new is added to the discography.

EP

Hardschool
Atlas Shrugged
Oklahoma
Soul Monster
New song
New song

Hell Freezes Over/Not In This Lifetime

Hardschool
Atlas Shrugged
Concert of assorted hits

Either one is a happy as pigs in shit scenario... especially if they ever comment positively on a vault liquidation project.

perfect track listing for a EP

#17 Re: Guns N' Roses » New Album Thread » 290 weeks ago

James wrote:
kemmep wrote:

I have read somewhere that gnr owes the reconrd company 1 more album & after that, i guess they are free to release music. When gnr is released from the record company, i'm curious what they will do.

Will they regularly release music? Can they use old recording sessions or does the record company not allow that? Who knows...

IMO the ship has sailed...and it sailed long ago... regarding GNR being a "real" band and creative entity. It's clearly not an environment or dynamic where these guys(and gal) are hanging out, shooting the shit, living in the studio basking in creativity, and recording to their hearts content...then hit the road for a year until it's time to grind out another album.

It is what it is.

I do believe we're going to get another album but it will likely be the last with various anniversary, deluxe editions and box sets of the discography the exception.

To be honest...with how the story played out...it's all they really need....

The core group releasing a self titled swan song. A half Chinese, half new or pre-CD era material would be fitting.

I'd be happy as a clam in that scenario.

I just hope they eventually go the Metallica route and start releasing the vault.


When gnr is released from the record company, i'm curious what they will do

Nothing?

Can anyone imagine GNR without a label? For those who can....do you imagine a NIN The Slip type release?

I can't.

They're not spring chickens and I can't imagine them or any of these other classic era bands being pioneers in a post-label musical dystopia.

It would also require proper management...which they are lacking.

100% true

#18 Re: The Garden » Euro 2020 » 290 weeks ago

AtariLegend wrote:

Hyped for England going out in the group stages.

Hidden Text:

sorry ape

Group A
Turkey
Italy
Wales
Switzerland

Group B
Denmark
Finland
Belgium
Russia

Group C
Netherlands
Ukraine
Austria
Winner Play-off Path D/A

Group D
England
Croatia
Winner Play-off Path C
Czech Republic

Group E
Spain
Sweden
Poland
Winner Play-off Path B

Group F
Winner Play-off Path A/D
Portugal
France
Germany

i'm predicting a netherlands and portugal final and fuck those english cunts

#19 Re: The Garden » Drinkin’ with Wasted » 290 weeks ago

wasted wrote:

You always feel better after 6 x IPAs and 2 doner wraps. Watched Once Upon a Time in Hollywood and now The Irishman. I love it when a plan comes together.

you need to go to some AA meetings get some help

#20 Re: Guns N' Roses » New Album Thread » 290 weeks ago

kemmep wrote:
Declan94 wrote:
kemmep wrote:

I have read somewhere that gnr owes the reconrd company 1 more album & after that, i guess they are free to release music. When gnr is released from the record company, i'm curious what they will do.

Will they regularly release music? Can they use old recording sessions or does the record company not allow that? Who knows...

they can use old recording sessions but i think they need to pay the old record company since the record company were the ones that paid for them to be in the studio. cause if GNR themselves paid for studio time during UYI sessions then that music would 100% belong to GNR cause they paid for it. do you get a better understanding of that?

Hmmm, that would suck, cause they recorded tons of stuff during that period. Well, positive thing is: lets just start from scratch with slash & co.

technically they probably could use the 94-96 sessions without permission from the record company cause they weren't even songs back then they were only ideas. and they could also use the chinese sessions cause they weren't even trademarked songs. and there is no proof that those songs even existed so GNR could do whatever they want with those ideas and songs without problems with the record company.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB