You are not logged in. Please register or login.

#181 Re: Guns N' Roses » A Random Forum Post about Finck » 884 weeks ago

My God.

It is like now Finck has semi-reverted back to him "old look" everyone is saying he 'sucks' again, like they did in 2001-early 2006.

My God.

(I'm not necessarily aiming this at you guys: just elements of the fanbase in general.)

#182 Re: Guns N' Roses » The Azoff factor re-examined: could he be targeting Bucket, not Slash? » 884 weeks ago

elmir wrote:

to get BH back, and one way to get him back is to leak/release heavily influenced BH tracks, give him some royalties off this new video game, make him realise how important he really was....get him back, tour the world, release this fucker....

I agree up to the original line-up reunion part.  But yes - such feats would indeed make Azoff (and Gould too?) very rich men.

elmir wrote:

.....he is first and foremost an artist, and to see and hear how the world is salivating over these shitty leaks must be making him feel pretty good, because there must be even better shit behind the scenes which we don't know about....

Isn't Buckethead's work on 'Prostitute' (if it is not 'song 2') said to be 'unique'?:P

elmir wrote:

he might just be tempted to do this again....

(Agree.)


DCK... I didn't steal the car... more got a ride in it once the original thief had walked away and left the doors open and the engine running.:smile:


Downliner - don't put too much faith in this speculation.  I personally don't think he will return.  But there is just as much increasing evidence of this as there is the original line-up reuniting, so maybe I'm just being really pessimistic/realistic - the bitter pill of years of being a GN'R fan.:haha::)

#183 Re: Guns N' Roses » Mysteron confirms "Shackler's Revenge" as an actual new GN'R song » 884 weeks ago

Scabbie wrote:

I'm also quite surprised how tolerant HTGTH appear to have been of Buckethead posts recently.

^^^  I'm surprised no one seems to have noticed this part of your post.

Karma.

I'll add that to the Bucket thread.

#184 Re: Guns N' Roses » The Azoff factor re-examined: could he be targeting Bucket, not Slash? » 884 weeks ago

DCK wrote:

What are you contacting Brain for? Are you actually so naive that you think he will reply to you?

I was nice to him.:peace:

After all, he replied to EMS - but yes, he probably does not reply to many e-mails: especially in the current climate to Guns-related people.

I also asked him if he knew the title of 'song 2' by the way - hence the climatic relevance.

It was worth a try I guess.:mosh:

#185 Re: Guns N' Roses » Mysteron confirms "Shackler's Revenge" as an actual new GN'R song » 884 weeks ago

James Lofton wrote:

and the new GNR "nutswingers" cant shit on him anymore because if they do, they're shitting on the tracks themselves.

misterID wrote:

I don't think the haters are running out of hate, they're running out of excuses.

The BH haters have a new trick now.  Those in powerful positions, such as serial Buckethead hater Madison on mygnr (hope I don't get banned there for posting this, LOL!), are now deleting posts to make it look like BH bashers have won the argument.  I don't know if you saw recently: but posts by JL, bigbri, and another Buckethead fan on mygnr (maybe Funeral or someone?) got deleted to make it look like Nesquik had somehow won the argument.  Figures.

#186 Re: Guns N' Roses » The Azoff factor re-examined: could he be targeting Bucket, not Slash? » 884 weeks ago

war wrote:
Arcade Roses wrote:
war wrote:

the argument may have died a while go but only because it wasn't true
now it is

Huh?  I thought it was true: several people confirmed it.  This was one of them.

war wrote:

if chinese democracy is on the launching pad i still say axl can get bucket back in the band  if he is willing to make up with him that is

When I first read that I thought you meant Axl is ready to make up with Bucket.  He is.  Or do you mean Bucket with Axl?  That's the big question - and maybe, as you and I both say, after all this time, he is?:)

It also depends on the other big question: can Azoff crack Bucket?  "What happens when an irresistible force meets an immovable object?", LOL.:haha::)

you said the argument, that axl could coax bucket back, died a while ago. true?
if so, i agree that it did because he tried and he couldn't - now he could. due to the album being ready for release and the fact that time mends broken hearts i belive bucket would return if axl is willing to, again, try to get him back. i don't think azoff is needed for this.

Top post.:thumbup:  In addition to that, can I just add, I don't know who it was a while ago, maybe Bucket or Brain or someone, who *hinted* in someway that he/they (he) would be ready to return to the fold once the album was on the launchpad.  (Oh yes, I remember now - it was Brain.:thumbup:)

However, I disagree with your last statement: I do agree that Bucket is one damn tough nut to crack - as we + Axl have found out before.  So, I do think Azoff will be needed in some capacity to bring Bucket back to the fold.  Why else was Azoff brought in then - unless Slash (and co.) were being targeted?  However, I personally think he is just in because 1.) He (and Gould) are good managers who can deal with Axl and 2. Merck *may* have recommended him (I remember reading somewhere they were *friends* or *acquaintances* in some way, were they not?).

That's another thing I forgot to mention in my original post: Gould's horror credentials.  I think someone has mentioned this before.:thumbup:  That would definitely appeal to Buckethead?  Maybe encourage him to return?:)


Karma for Mr. Lofton.:beer:

#187 Re: Guns N' Roses » The Azoff factor re-examined: could he be targeting Bucket, not Slash? » 885 weeks ago

war wrote:

the argument may have died a while go but only because it wasn't true
now it is

Huh?  I thought it was true: several people confirmed it.  This was one of them.

war wrote:

if chinese democracy is on the launching pad i still say axl can get bucket back in the band  if he is willing to make up with him that is

When I first read that I thought you meant Axl is ready to make up with Bucket.  He is.  Or do you mean Bucket with Axl?  That's the big question - and maybe, as you and I both say, after all this time, he is?:)

It also depends on the other big question: can Azoff crack Bucket?  "What happens when an irresistible force meets an immovable object?", LOL.:haha::)

#188 Re: Guns N' Roses » The Azoff factor re-examined: could he be targeting Bucket, not Slash? » 885 weeks ago

war wrote:

he didn't do a good job then cause finck is a part of the lineup that included bucket. we are starting to see how much bucket is involved with the material. he recorded so much stuff back then that there was nothing else for him to do i suppose, other than touring appetite material and watching axl add synth to all the songs 'so to speak.

Finck's departure was much more recent - hence the bitter taste left by the 'pill' may still be in his mouth.  For Bucket and others it may have faded by now, IMHO.:)

Finck may be a tougher nut to crack....

war wrote:

i imagine that axl could get bucket back in the band by himself.

This argument died a while ago, IIRC.  They tried repeatedly to get Bucket back into the fold in (early) 2006: and failed miserably.  Sources close to Bucket both on his forum, HTGTH, and of course Del's article later in the year confirmed this to be true.  The HTGTH guy (who actually is *linked* to the person I have e-mailed) actually said that: "Things are very bitter now (as of early 2006) between Axl and Bucket: in fact even more so than Slash", I think he said.  But as I said things may have changed now with/over time though.:)

"The things he said were very hurtful...." - bucket

#189 Guns N' Roses » The Azoff factor re-examined: could he be targeting Bucket, not Slash? » 885 weeks ago

Arcade Roses
Replies: 60

I woke up one Thursday morning a couple of weeks ago with a brainwave: what if Irving Azoff and co. have been brought in to attempt to reunite the Buckethead era, not the Slash era.

More and more as time has gone on we have had Bucket all over yet more songs and now 'Shackler's Revenge' a rumoured Bucket-dominated title.  Hell, as someone recently said the instrumentals of this album would make a great Buckethead album!:rock::buckethead:

Also consider the timing of the announcement: Finck's 'departure'.  Maybe Axl/whoever has brought Azoff and Gould in to help reunite the strongest line-up of the band (what I call 'Plan A'): the 2001/02 version of the band, minus studio member Huge.

And I forgot to mention in my original post: factor in Gould's 'horror' credentials to that.  Would definitely appeal to Bucket + may in some way help lure him back into the band.:)

Scabbie has also recently reported that "HTGTH has become more tolerant of Buckethead posts lately".  Kudos, Scabbie!:mosh:


I don't think I'd seen this notion posted anywhere else but as people are starting to *lean* towards it now thought I would start a thread about it (before someone *nicks* it from me, *ahem*:)).

(It should also be interesting to see what Misterr Brain says should he get back to me.  (He is one of two people I have contacted.))

#190 Re: Guns N' Roses » Entertainment Weekly suggests GN'R may perform at VMA's » 885 weeks ago

war wrote:

i think we're alone now
there doesn't seem to be anyone around now

Can I just throw this in then (before I go) (and the topic resumes): the pictures have been confirmed as fake: they are a French artist called Fanalo or something.  Bigbri is right: it's not BH.:)

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB