You are not logged in. Please register or login.

#181 Re: Guns N' Roses » 101 Document Titles From Axls Laptop (No Actual Documents Tho) » 749 weeks ago

ppp
Intercourse wrote:

I think if Axl has been forcing financially tight, little known musicians to sign gagging orders as part of joining GNR then treating them like shit and not paying them for their hard work then he deserves this shit to leak and to be judged by his peers.

Every dog has his day.

Oh poor mistreated leeches!

Do you think any of those people joined GNR because they thought they'd be the one to lead the band or make all the money? They knew it was Axl's band when they signed up. No one forced them to join and no one forces them to stay.

The sole reason they are there is because GNR is a known band and they can get attention for themselves and their otherwise unknown careers. Bumblefoot can sell an album 30x better than he could without them.

Axl cannot refuse to pay them or they'd be in court. I don't any of these people, no matter how much they need to band to be relevant, would work for free. It's against the law.

#182 Re: Guns N' Roses » 101 Document Titles From Axls Laptop (No Actual Documents Tho) » 749 weeks ago

ppp
bigbri wrote:
tejastech08 wrote:
bigbri wrote:

Interesting titles, but we don't know if they are true or even what's in them. Axl's email about "dissolving GNR and having DJ sued" could just be him saying "no" to somebody else's suggestion, just like "Better video treatment" could just be Axl saying "no thanks."

These titles mean absolutely nothing. What if Axl's "thoughts on VR" were that they are a fantastic band?

Still a con by MSL as far as I'm concerned. I've believed that from Day 1, and I still do.

I hope that's what it is. That's what I thought it was until the alleged director of the Better video told someone in an email that he did work on the project. Then again, maybe the guy who said he emailed the director was really just MSL hiding behind a different name to further his little ego-trip. I hope that's the case. Nemus being involved in it and ranting against MSL on it makes me somewhat worried that it's real.

Dark could be in on it. Classic "good cop, bad cop" strategy.

Then again, could be real. But we don't know because there's no evidence one way or the other.

Saying Doc was fired then Axl announces it doesn't cut it for me. Axl fires managers as often as most of us change underwear.

MSL isn't the one who leaked the Doc info. Metal Sludge is the one who leaked that. MSL went back and edited his original post after they did and acted as if he was the one who leaked it.

Personally, I think he has "something". But I think he's added it to and lied about it, in order to make it sound more interesting.

#183 Re: Guns N' Roses » 101 Document Titles From Axls Laptop (No Actual Documents Tho) » 749 weeks ago

ppp

The more I read this list, the more I am convinced it's not an enemies list, nor is it a list of people who like Slash or have worked with him.

If it was an enemies list, surely it would include members of the media and Slash. If it were simply a list of people who have worked with Slash or take his side, Howard Weitzman, Merck Mercuriadis, Sanctuary, Doug Goldstein and a number of other people that have never worked with Slash alone would not be on here. Steven Adler has no relationship with Slash in ealry 2008 and neither did Arlett Vereecke.

I think this is a list of people that Axl believes don't want to work with him again. That's really the only thing all these people. It would explain why there are no media names (like Mick Wall), since any of them would love to interview Axl. It would explain why there is no mention of Scott Weiland, since he said at the end of VR he'd love to meet Axl. It would explain why there is no mention of Irv Azoff, even though he was VR's manager at the time. And it would explain why there is no Slash, since Axl knows after the infamous 2005 house visit that Slash would gladly work with him again.

#184 Re: Guns N' Roses » *RUMOR* Possible GnR one-off reunion for Superbowl XLVI? » 749 weeks ago

ppp

Yeah I don't think too many people would get excited about a reunion without Axl. He and Slash would both have to agree to be there.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB