You are not logged in. Please register or login.

#1701 Re: The Sunset Strip » Quentin Tarantino's Inglorious Basterds (Trailer & One Sheets Inside) » 854 weeks ago

Great!  I loved Brad Pitt in The Curious Case of Benjamin Button.  My favorite Tarantino films are the first two and this one is closer in vein to those two than his recent output.

#1702 Re: The Garden » ARod tested positive for steroids in 2003 » 854 weeks ago

Boy lots to go over here

You talk as if Jeter sucks in the field? Not true dude. And A-Rod could have played Short and the Yankees would still not have won shit because of his inability to be a good player in the clutch.

As a defensive SS, Jeter STINKS. His uzr (zone rating) is the worst in baseball.  If you want I can dig up articles to back this point up.  His range is mediocre.  Now this doesn't take into consideration his hitting ability.  But on defense he is a liability.  Before you bring up the he won 3 gold gloves from 2004-2006, I'd like to point out that this same institution gave Rafael Palmeiro the gold glove in 1999 when he only played 30 games at first base!

Team captain? They've been friends since A-Rod was in Seattle. You make it sound like Jeter is sticking up for him out of formality rather than friendship.

Their friendship became strained when he made some negative comments about Jeter in a GQ article in 2000 or 2001.  I think he elaborated on this topic last year in an interview.

No one is better in the clutch than Jeter has been the past ten years.

This is the only part that bugs me in the Jeter vs Arod battle.  How come no one mentions Arods monster 2000 ALCS where he hit .409 and had an ops of 1.200?  The career numbers aren't that different, but Jeter has had a ton more at bats and games played in postseason.  If Arod were given enough at bats I think he could surpass Jeter's achievements in the playoffs.  I think some of this is that Jeter is a much more likable guy than Arod and he helped the Yankees win 4 World Series from 1996-2000.  But the clutch argument is overstated and somewhat media driven.  Again, I'm not taking anything away from Jeter--he is a HOF player who'll end up with 3,000+ hits.  He is just slightly overrated that's all.

So enjoy A-Rod, where the light on your ass is gonna be the brightest.

Hell, he could have taken less money and went wherever he wanted to when he became a free agent in 2007--Anaheim, Cubs, White Sox whatever.  But he CHOSE to stay with the Yankees and all the issues that come with that.  So I have zero sympathy for him in that regard.

#1703 Re: Guns N' Roses » Axl Rose Speaks to Billboard » 854 weeks ago

The more I see this saga roll the more convinced I am that Axl believes that Slash has no right to be out there talking about his work on AFD etc because he is not in GNR and Axl owns the band now.

But don't Duff and Izzy share the same criteria?  I think part of this bitterness stems from Slash quitting the band in 1996.  I think Marc Canter said that Slash tried to get back in the band during the late 1990s.  Duff and Izzy have never tried to rejoin the band. 

I think Slash's continued success and respected position in modern music and media galls Axl and has played havoc with his comfort zone as he tried to bring the nuGNR crew forward.

I agree with this statement 100%.  His status in the music world has surpassed Axl as well.

Parts of this interview reminded me of the OMG press release

Yes, there is a certain incoherent rambling aspect that made this interview difficult to read and interpret.

#1704 Re: Dust N' Bones & Cyborg Slunks » Duff writing yet another column. Playboy » 854 weeks ago

Matt Groening is a GN'R fan, and named Duff Beer after him. That's the story I was always told as a Simpsons fan, not GN'R.

I find it strange that Duff (or the band) never made an appearance on the Simpsons.  They've used WTTJ twice on the show--1F03 Marge on the Lam and GABF07 Mobile Homer.  Marge on the Lam was in S5 and since GNR was still active and together they could have appeared on that particular show.

#1705 Re: The Garden » ARod tested positive for steroids in 2003 » 854 weeks ago

A-Rod finally admitted to it, but he ONLY used it from 2001-2003 during his tenure with the Texas Rangers.

Bullshit

Like I really believe he cut the 'roids, and then hit like what, 54 homers with the Yankees in 2007.

He's full of shit, he's still using them.

Yep.  I don't know whether or not he's still currently using them but his reasoning is faulty.  He expects most people to believe that he started using steroids after he scored a 10 year 252 million dollar deal with the Texas Rangers in the Spring of 2001.  He already had the money, so why would he have any incentive to start using then? He could have just coasted off that mega deal.  I think he purposely omitted his Yankee tenure because he didn't want to endure more crap from the NY media as they shit on him enough.

#1706 Re: The Garden » ARod tested positive for steroids in 2003 » 854 weeks ago

I have always been interested in how this affects the stats of those players who have used/tested positive for steroids.  Do you automatically just put a big giant asterisk next to their name?  I'll take Bonds as an example:  he won MVPS in 1990, 1992, and 1993 while steroid free.  I remember watching an old 1997 Giants game a few years ago and his physical stature wasn't as different as the 1992 Bonds.  Bonds steroid use started in 1999 so do you view all stats accumulated then with an asterisk?  What happens to players who used steroids for a short period of time like Andy Pettite?  Do they get lumped in with the massive cheaters?  What about Sammy Sosa who has never been shown to have taken steroids?  There have been rumors about him but there was never any actual evidence to support this claim.  If nothing ever surfaces (proof) do you keep him out of the Hall of Fame?

The interesting thing will be, if Congress takes this up again, where will it go? If they really begin looking in the NFL, they may find more than any body wants to know.

Since you brought this up, former 49ers DT Dana Stubblefield just gave federal investigators information which involves steroid use and distribution within the NFL.  He was one of the football players whose name was on the BALCO investigation.  So, I wouldn't be surprised if there is an upcoming shitstorm involving steroids and the NFL.  However the NFL does have far superior PR skills to weather whatever fallout may occur from a federal investigation.

Here's a link to the Stubblefield article:

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=3889356

#1707 Re: Guns N' Roses » Axl Rose Speaks to Billboard » 854 weeks ago

Listen to that CD and pay attention to the drums. Not only is it the best drumming of any GNR cd, but it contains some of the nicest drum work ever laid down on a rock CD.

I agree with the comment about Adler.  I remember watching the Oklahoma 92 DVD and just how flat Sorum sounded on the drums to the point where it took away from the performance.

#1708 The Garden » ARod tested positive for steroids in 2003 » 854 weeks ago

slashsfro
Replies: 87

In 2003, when he won the American League home run title and the AL Most Valuable Player award as a shortstop for the Texas Rangers, Alex Rodriguez tested positive for two anabolic steroids, four sources have independently told Sports Illustrated.

Rodriguez's name appears on a list of 104 players who tested positive for performance-enhancing drugs in Major League Baseball's '03 survey testing, SI's sources say. As part of a joint agreement with the MLB Players Association, the testing was conducted to determine if it was necessary to impose mandatory random drug testing across the major leagues in 2004.

When approached by an SI reporter on Thursday at a gym in Miami, Rodriguez declined to discuss his 2003 test results. "You'll have to talk to the union," said Rodriguez, the Yankees' third baseman since his trade to New York in February 2004. When asked if there was an explanation for his positive test, he said, "I'm not saying anything."

Phone messages left by SI for players' union executive director Donald Fehr were not returned.

Though MLB's drug policy has expressly prohibited the use of steroids without a valid prescription since 1991, there were no penalties for a positive test in 2003. The results of that year's survey testing of 1,198 players were meant to be anonymous under the agreement between the commissioner's office and the players association. Rodriguez's testing information was found, however, after federal agents, armed with search warrants, seized the '03 test results from Comprehensive Drug Testing, Inc., of Long Beach, Calif., one of two labs used by MLB in connection with that year's survey testing. The seizure took place in April 2004 as part of the government's investigation into 10 major league players linked to the BALCO scandal -- though Rodriguez himself has never been connected to BALCO.

The list of the 104 players whose urine samples tested positive is under seal in California. However, two sources familiar with the evidence that the government has gathered in its investigation of steroid use in baseball and two other sources with knowledge of the testing results have told Sports Illustrated that Rodriguez is one of the 104 players identified as having tested positive, in his case for testosterone and an anabolic steroid known by the brand name Primobolan. All four sources spoke on the condition of anonymity due to the sensitive nature of the evidence.

Primobolan, which is also known by the chemical name methenolone, is an injected or orally administered drug that is more expensive than most steroids. (A 12-week cycle can cost $500.) It improves strength and maintains lean muscle with minimal bulk development, according to steroid experts, and has relatively few side effects. Kirk Radomski, the former New York Mets clubhouse employee who in 2007 pleaded guilty to illegal distribution of steroids to numerous major league players, described in his recent book, Bases Loaded: The Inside Story of the Steroid Era in Baseball by the Central Figure in the Mitchell Report, how players increasingly turned to drugs such as Primobolan in 2003, in part to avoid detection in testing. Primobolan is detectable for a shorter period of time than the steroid previously favored by players, Deca-Durabolin. According to a search of FDA records, Primobolan is not an approved prescription drug in the United States, nor was it in 2003. (Testosterone can be taken legally with an appropriate medical prescription.)

Rodriguez finished the 2003 season by winning his third straight league home run title (with 47) and the first of his three MVP awards.

Because more than 5% of big leaguers had tested positive in 2003, baseball instituted a mandatory random-testing program, with penalties, in '04. According to the 2007 Mitchell Report on steroid use in baseball, in September 2004, Gene Orza, the chief operating officer of the players' union, violated an agreement with MLB by tipping off a player (not named in the report) about an upcoming, supposedly unannounced drug test. Three major league players who spoke to SI said that Rodriguez was also tipped by Orza in early September 2004 that he would be tested later that month. Rodriguez declined to respond on Thursday when asked about the warning Orza provided him.

When Orza was asked on Friday in the union's New York City office about the tipping allegations, he told a reporter, "I'm not interested in discussing this information with you."

Anticipating that the 33-year-old Rodriguez, who has 553 career home runs, could become the game's alltime home run king, the Yankees signed him in November 2007 to a 10-year, incentive-laden deal that could be worth as much as $305 million. Rodriguez is reportedly guaranteed $275 million and could receive a $6 million bonus each time he ties one of the four players at the top of the list: Willie Mays (660), Babe Ruth (714), Hank Aaron (755) and Barry Bonds (762), and an additional $6 million for passing Bonds. In order to receive the incentive money, the contract reportedly requires Rodriguez to make extra promotional appearances and sign memorabilia for the Yankees as part of a marketing plan surrounding his pursuit of Bonds's record. Two sources familiar with Rodriguez's contract told SI that there is no language about steroids in the contract that would put Rodriguez at risk of losing money.

Arguments before an 11-judge panel in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Pasadena are ongoing between government prosecutors and the players' association over the government's seizure of the test results from the Long Beach lab. The agents who collected the material had a search warrant only for the results for the 10 BALCO-linked players. Attorneys from the union argue that the government is entitled only to the results for those players, not the entire list. If the court sides with the union, federal authorities may be barred from using the positive survey test results of non-BALCO players such as Rodriguez in their ongoing investigations.

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/b … ml?eref=T1

Wow! I thought he was one of the few who was clean.  I guess Canseco gets vindicated again.

There's also this denial from Arod in 2007 that he ever used PED, HGH and steroids.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/12/ … 7425.shtml

#1709 Re: Guns N' Roses » Axl Rose Speaks to Billboard » 854 weeks ago

Axl is a bitter old man like Mr. Scrooge that sits in his house, never comes out, never hangs with fans, and when he gets his chance to tell his story, he rags on Slash... again

I think he is more like Mr. Burns of the Simpsons.

#1710 Re: Guns N' Roses » Axl Rose Speaks to Billboard » 854 weeks ago

Why is Axl so bitter towards only Slash though?

What did Slash do so bad that the others haven't?

Izzy talked just as much shit about Axl in that Classic Rock interview.


One could presume that Axl may be jealous of Slash.

I think Axl thought that Slash would fall off the face of the earth without Guns N Roses and Axl was insecure and thought he HAD to have the GNR name.

Slash without Axl is a global icon, well liked, respected by his peers and formed a brand new band and went double platinum and won a grammy while CD has been a bomb and Axl is one of the most hated musicians of all time.

What else could it be?

I like how people try to demonize Slash for wanting to "Take Over The Band" but its perfectly ok for Axl to take it over?

That's the fascinating part about this article, you can still feel the hostility towards Slash, especially during this line:

There are acts that, once committed between individuals, they are what they are. To add insult to injury almost day after day, lapsing into year after year, for more than a decade, is a nightmare.

Is he speaking about the constant lawsuits filed by Slash?  His usage of language during the last sentence is particularly striking.  He still can't get past whatever issues led to the breakup as those events still haunt him.  I think the jealously thing might have some legs to it.  Remember when MSL gave an interview last year where he said the Guns camp was still obsessed with Slash?

Look I'll admit it Slash is a media whore who gives interviews like once every month.  He knows how to play the game and is quite good at it.  If Axl would change his ways the media would portray him in a better light.  His problem in staying silent for so long following original Guns breakup was that it allowed him to be defined by those negative stories told by Slash, Duff, Gilby etc.  Had he simply stated the reasons why he and the original band went their own separate ways in like 1998 or 1999 the media would have been kinder.  Think of this as sort of political theatre.  Axl failed to punch back for whatever reason.  Now the entire clusterfuck in the making of Chinese Democracy was self-inflicted and had zero to do with Slash.

Now the stuff he says about possibly working with Duff makes sense as I never got that he hated Duff as much as Slash.  I think his issues with Duff were because a)he was a Slash defender b)the legal issues --lawsuits etc c)musical differences during making of Illusions.  Duff stayed around a year after Slash left so its not like those two are joined at the hip.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB