You are not logged in. Please register or login.

#151 Re: Guns N' Roses » If GNR releases nothing in 2023, is this the end for you? » 101 weeks ago

LOL, so an extra $30 for a hat that I could get exponentially cheaper (and better designed) on Ebay or one of the other sites.

I think the Lebesis' becoming managers is one of the truly tragic parts of this saga.  They basically emotionally blackballed him into giving them spots that they have no experience in.  They should just stayed in their roles as his surrogate family.  The manager there's a lot of business/economic stuff to deal with and he more than anyone else could just use an experienced guy who can handle all this stuff painlessly (or dole out the responsbility) instead of making it seem happy amateur hour that it is now.

#152 Re: Guns N' Roses » If GNR releases nothing in 2023, is this the end for you? » 101 weeks ago

WARose wrote:

Working on the record for 6 years in 1997? Doesn‘t really add up..

Nah.  This one I believe.  If he's been in the studio/writing since Illusions had been released in 1991, then yeah I consider it "working". I mean he doesn't have to have recorded anything in those years.

Why he got pissed off at Moby (and continues to to this day) for asking that Q is the weird part to me.

#153 Re: Guns N' Roses » 2023 Tour Dates » 102 weeks ago

Sky Dog wrote:

Never ending bullshit……

Yep.  Toss a crumb here, toss a crumb there.   You get lucky if they release one or two new songs.  Repeat pattern since late 90s.

#154 Re: Guns N' Roses » 2023 Tour Dates » 102 weeks ago

I just looked up some of the seats available.  The only show that had decent ticket sales was the Boston one and the STL show.  The rest of them, especially the ones in the Southeast had wide open spaces.

Some of these are embarrassing in terms of how many seats are available.  Nothing but big spatches of blue.

#155 Re: The Sunset Strip » Most Recent Movie You've Seen » 102 weeks ago

James wrote:

Misery - I think I said this a couple years ago when I watched it....this really has a Lifetime movie vibe with hindsight. It's ok but I don't think it holds up very well. I doubt I watch this ever again.

Saw this a while ago and never got the big deal.  A nice enough film but nowhere near the classic its touted as.

James wrote:

The Net - So glad I watched this...hadn't watched it since 1995-96. I love these dated movies showing the internet of the 1990s. Kinda ahead of its time actually...she gets food delivered through it and of course all her data gets stolen and the plot revolves around that.

My only complaint is the same as with The Pelican Brief....if they'd just leave her alone, shed probably never find out the extent of what she had stumbled upon. Putting a target on her just highlights the problem. Just grab the disc and leave her alone.


True.  Of the two "tech" films that came out (Hackers being the other one) back then.  I find the Net the more watchable one. Probably because Bullock pulls off the damsel in distress/hero in peril stuff pretty well.   The tech is dated as hell but I don't hold that against it.


The Hunger.  I had a real fun time rewatching this.  Probably the only time Cahterine Denueve will be the star/first billed on a US film.   It's kind arty but not to the point where you can't watch it.  Great eclectic soundtrack.  Bowie actually isn't in the film that much but he does a great job.  This film pulls off the gothic (old school kind) and 80s feel at the same time.  The ending is still kind of weird to me even though I've seen this film a number of times.

#156 Re: Guns N' Roses » If GNR releases nothing in 2023, is this the end for you? » 102 weeks ago

James wrote:

The passage of time and how its perception changes is a mind blowing and frightening aspect of aging.

Yep.  And related to this some memories from childhood remain crystal clear and you can remember them in full detail while if you asked me what I had for lunch last week, I couldn't tell you.

I don't know if I've said this but the leaks saga for CD might be more interesting than the music itself.  Cheers to those who remember details from these things from 20-25 years ago.

#157 Re: Guns N' Roses » If GNR releases nothing in 2023, is this the end for you? » 103 weeks ago

James wrote:

Time passed by so much slower in those days. I can blink and two years will have passed by....but it was forever back then.


Yep.  I enjoyed and looked forward to Summer where you could just kind of kick back and relax and watch a bunch of MTV. Now? I can't wait for Summer to be over because it's so hot.   It's weird because people "our age" we all complain about how Summer sucks now.  Time...was just different then.  It's hard to explain but I'm sure most will understand. It'll never be the same again and given what I have been told about this current generation, the future may not be better.

Sorry for going off there.

Duff and Slash are content with this setup so, whatever Team Brazil screwup happened (like removing the article) doesn't matter.  They are in it for the touring revenue as long as that keeps rolling in, they will put up with a lot of crap.   Those two guys have families now to support and it's a business decision for both of them.

#158 Re: Guns N' Roses » If GNR releases nothing in 2023, is this the end for you? » 103 weeks ago

James wrote:

One more thing....

It blows me away he never attempted going solo. The potential to do something was clearly there.

He got way too caught up in the GNR thing post 95, hooked up with a wacky group of people, and the years and his career just started slipping away.


That's the damndest thing.  He won or had the name post 95 and did shit with it.  It didn't matter that Slash/Duff/Izzy weren't there.  The name (in the mid-late 90s) still meant something and had some cache in the music world.  Even if he released CD at some point at worst in 2000, he could have still did the reunion and fetched money.  The name gets you interest from casuals at least and who knows where it might have led.   Van Halen, Motley Crue and others released records w/out iconic members in the 90s and did fine afterwards.

They were only relevant in pop culture for maybe 3 years.  Incredible if you think about it.  Metallica has been way more relevant in pop culture and has been for decades. GNR got lucky as they were lighting in a bottle and came around at the right time.

#159 Re: The Sunset Strip » Most Recent Movie You've Seen » 103 weeks ago

It's a damn shame about the new Indy film.  Guess I'll catch it when it hits the streamers. 

Dead or Alive: more Miike.  This one is in his prime.  A lot of stuff gets tossed in and I love the wacky/out of bounds/non confomrist images that would make most who don't watch his films (which is 99% of the public) squeamish.  This one goes back to his usual yakuza vs cops fare. I found the theme of the outsider pretty well established.  One thing I've noticed about his films in general.  I have a tendency to just drift in the middle of his films sometimes where I kind of have to get re-amped. It happens with almost every film with the exception of maybe Audition.  Anyway, I can overlook this as there are these sequences that are just wonderfully shot and great.  I'll take the strikeout in exchange for the multiple HR's.

King of New York.  Rewatched this one and have no idea why this one isn't thought of more highly or mentioned among great 90s crime films. You've got Christopher Walken as the lead.  Lawrence Fisburne having fun as a bad guy.  Pre breakout roles from both Wesley Snipes and David Caruso.  Plus there's a small cameo by Steve Buschemi.  Also you have NYC in neon lit/pre cleanup glory (it's not as grimy as the 70s-80s but it's not sanitized either).  I think the story is pretty good.  Takes convention and twists it a little.  I mean he actually wants to do a good thing in the film and not just regain his criminal empire.  I liked the fact that the main cop hunting the Walken character wasn't some loud brash cop, but some old guy who was introspective and pragmatic.

Night Moves; another under the radar one.  this one is a 70s conspiracy mystery type.  I was struck by how close to the Jake Gitties Nicholson character that the main character Harry Moseby was.  There's a lot of stuff to unpack in this movie from psychological stuff to the plot points.  Great 70s soundtrack.  This one is another great Hackman performance.  James Woods and Melanie Griffith in very early roles here.

since it's close to July 4th, I may watch a Clint Eastwood film.  Maybe Tightrope.

#160 Re: The Sunset Strip » Most Recent Movie You've Seen » 104 weeks ago

James wrote:

The Parallex View - I had really high hopes for this... although I can't stand Warren Beatty.

It was ok. The story is a bit clunky... really drags there in the middle. Has a great ending though.

Surprising this never got a remake.

The beginning is pretty fun too.  But yeah, beginning and the end are great.  I always get lost in the middle (seen it like 2-3 times).  It's definitely behind Marathon Man, and 3 days of the condor in terms of 70s conspiracy thrillers.  Maybe even Capricorn One, although I haven't seen that one in a while.   I've always found Beatty very overrated.  I prefer Shampoo over this one.  It's  probably the only Beatty film I really like.

Did a mini Miike fest this week:

Shield of Straw--this one had the best premise.  Scumbag pedophile killer has a bounty (2 bil yen) put on him by a rich guy and the cops have to bring him in (shades of Midnight Run).  And it starts off well for the first 40 mins or so.  You got people trying to kill this guy for the money from all angles.  It slows down and we get focused on the main character including the killer.  This is where it just bores me .  It gets predictable and the actor playing the killer really doesn't make me care about the character.  Honestly, I just wanted them to kill him because he was annoying.  A misfire here by Miike but not unwatchable.  He should have just went gonzo with it instead of getting all predictable.

Lesson of Evil; seen this one once before and was curious about rewatching it.   First off, the guy playing the villan is great.  You notice acting differences immediatley.  He's evil and fucked up but there is a charisma and you care what happens to him more or less.  I think the plot is the weak point, they would have been better off streamlining it.  I ended up dozing off for a few mins because it took pretty long to get to the best part of the film--the ending.  I admit, when I first saw the ending sequence I thought it was overkill. Now, I see it as brilliant filmaking by Miike.  There's one Matrix inspired sequence that is very cool.  And another one that takes advantage of hand held
camera shots.  Oh, this will never be remade in the USA because of...well if you watch it you'll understand.  This one was good

First Love--this one was probably my favorite.  It's a story about love buried in with Miike's usual violence and yakuza wackiness.  And I have no problem with that.  It's very heavy on black comedy, so you can't really take the violent bits all that seriously.  This takes place mostly at night so there are a lot of Tokyo here which I appreciated.  USA directors don't know how to make cities anymore but thankfully that doesn't extended to foreign directors.  Oh I focused on another character and found her a lot more interesting this time I watched.  I think Miike probably hit his creative peak in the late 90s-early 2000s.  But this one was just as enjoyable.  And really, I liked the softer/character non chaos moments just as much.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB