You are not logged in. Please register or login.

#141 Re: Guns N' Roses » Richard: 'Get An Album Out Soon' » 331 weeks ago

elevendayempire wrote:

The "industrial" thing ended up being a bit overstated, though. After all that hoo-ha, Chinese Democracy ended up being a hard rock record with some industrial touches on individual songs – and most of the songs ended up cleaving so close to the hard rock template of the old band that Slash and Duff have no qualms playing them on stage (hell, Duff played Shackler's Revenge on stage with the Chinese Democracy-era band).

Axl planned to evolve the band's sound, as musicians tend to do – does The White Album sound like the work of the same band that produced Please Please Me? 90s!Slash wanted to trap the band in a rut of regressive, bog-standard hard-rock riffs at exactly the moment that new musical movements like grunge, industrial and nu-metal were shaking up the rock landscape – and if GN'R had released Slash's preferred album after TSI? it would've sunk without trace. I don't think Axl is always right by any means, but I think he had a better handle on what the band needed to do back then than the other members (I also think it's telling that Duff, probably the most level-headed member of the band, stuck around longest and was the first classic-era member to put out feelers to Axl during the Chinese Democracy era).

AC/DC never chased trends and it worked out very well for them over time. The biggest songwriting problem for GN'R was they ran out of stuff to say once they got rich. They built a lot of great songs based on their gutter rat lifestyle in the 1980's.

#142 Re: Guns N' Roses » Richard: 'Get An Album Out Soon' » 331 weeks ago

elevendayempire wrote:
apex-twin wrote:

Compare Snakepit mk 1 with the Constipators.

Back then, setting up a sideproject caused a rift in Guns.

Today, Slash has  an established band on his own. Axl owns Guns. No conflict in that.

I think it was less "setting up a side project" (hadn't Duff already put out a solo record?) than "Axl thought he should get first dibs on all the riffs".

I dunno if Axl should have dibs, but GN'R itself should be more important to all the guys than their solo projects.

I think the biggest rift in GN'R was caused by Axl showing up late for concerts and his decision to change GN'R from a hard rock band to an industrial band. That's a pretty radical shift and I can see how the other guys would be turned off by it.

#143 Re: Guns N' Roses » Richard: 'Get An Album Out Soon' » 331 weeks ago

Sky Dog wrote:

Agree. Just release an album. Everything doesn’t have to be about legacies and ruling the world in your mid 50’s. axl

I would certainly like to hear Axl's voice in the studio before it's completely gone. We are getting closer and closer to that point based on the live performances we have seen in recent years.

Would be nice if we could get some Blu-ray releases of older shows, especially from the club days in 1986 and 1987.

#144 Re: Guns N' Roses » Izzy: "Sometimes things don't work out" » 331 weeks ago

TheSundanceKid wrote:

I dig Izzy his song writing and his do what I want attitude is solid.

But, dude needs to realize he wasn’t going to get the same share of the pie for a lame as fuck guest spot. No one gives two shits about those except the hardcore fans.

Maybe actually complete a whole tour with the band, and then you’d have some credibility. Prove your worth type of thing.

I realize you posted this many months ago, but I'm responding anyway. lol

Izzy proved his worth when he helped write and record Appetite, Lies, and Illusion albums. The tour wouldn't even be happening if not for the awesome music that was recorded between 1987 and 1991. That music wouldn't even exist without Izzy. His fingerprints are all over it as much as Axl's fingerprints or Slash's fingerprints or Duff's fingerprints.

#145 Re: Guns N' Roses » Richard: 'Get An Album Out Soon' » 331 weeks ago

elevendayempire wrote:

There's a hunger to get an album out there from both the band – who want to cement their legacy – and the suits (who want that big GN'R reunion album payday).

I don't think there are big paydays from album sales anymore.

Meanwhile, I think the GN'R legacy is already cemented from the Appetite, Lies, and Illusion era. They took the world by the balls in spectacular fashion and they imploded in spectacular fashion. New album would be nice for the fans, but it's not going to change the legacy of GN'R.

#146 Re: Guns N' Roses » Richard: 'Get An Album Out Soon' » 331 weeks ago

I'll believe it when it actually happens. Hope for the best, but not expecting anything.

#148 Re: Guns N' Roses » new gnr song debuted » 336 weeks ago

Axl is a hell of a troll. First studio vocals in a decade? Looney Tunes song. 16

#149 Re: Guns N' Roses » Unseen footage Pro Shot - Saskatoon, SK, Ca 1993 » 371 weeks ago

So wait, this gig is being censored? Of all the live material posted on YouTube...why does this one get censored? Very strange.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB