You are not logged in. Please register or login.

#111 Re: Guns N' Roses » Baz now claims 4 GNR albums exist » 920 weeks ago

Jimmy Zig Zag Bobiadis wrote:
bringbackadler wrote:

I only see 5 guys as actually being GN'R. Axl, Slash, Duff, Izzy, and Steve. 4 of the 5 of those guys may be ex-members now but they will always be the guys who actually are Guns N Roses to me.

bba

Well dude, that is my opinion. Do you live in Iraq or something ? Is that why you are unable to accept someone else's opinion ?

If in your mind GN'R = a revolving door of musicians that Axl has on payroll, and doesn't release albums with, that's your decision, and you are most certainly entitled to that opinion.

To me, and a shitload of other people in the world, GN'R will always be the 5 guys that I already mentioned.

It doesn't mean that I don't want to hear Axl's new music. Log off of htgth for a day or 2 and you will probably be able to comprehend a difference of opinion a little better.  16


bba

#112 Re: Guns N' Roses » Baz now claims 4 GNR albums exist » 920 weeks ago

Jimmy Zig Zag Bobiadis wrote:

YOU do not decide who is Guns N' Roses.  You do not own the name.   You do not make that call.

Dude, who said that I was able to decide who's in GN'R ?  You're being ridiculous.  16

Like I already said, most people wouldn't be able to tell you that Robin Finck was a guitar player in GN'R. If you can't accept that reality, write a letter to Axl whining that he needs to do a better job at promoting them. I'm not saying that it's Robin and Fortus' fault that people don't know who they are after all these years, but it's still the way that it is.


bba

#113 Re: Guns N' Roses » Lay Your Cards on the Line » 920 weeks ago

Jameslofton wrote:

http://img487.imageshack.us/img487/1024 … rsekr9.gif

Cmon guys, lets keep the hijacking to a minimum. I have nothing against off topic discussion, but this same thing is happening in like 3 threads. This is actually a good thread where a variety of issues can be discussed and a simple quiz on what you think has caused us to be at this point.

Sorry James.

I posted in another thread responding to JB before reading your request/demand.

My bust.


bba

#114 Re: Guns N' Roses » Baz now claims 4 GNR albums exist » 920 weeks ago

Jimmy Zig Zag Bobiadis wrote:
bringbackadler wrote:
the dirt wrote:

I honestly think that the people that tour with Axl are not "bandmembers", none of them at all.

The only one you can make a case for is Dizzy, but that's simply because he's been there the longest.

Oh, I completely agree with you, the dirt.

I wasn't trying to suggest that all of the guys up on stage were band members except for Dizzy ...

I don't personally see ANY of them as Guns N Roses band members either.

I only see 5 guys as actually being GN'R. Axl, Slash, Duff, Izzy, and Steve. 4 of the 5 of those guys may be ex-members now but they will always be the guys who actually are Guns N Roses to me.

I'm well aware who tours under the band name these days, and they may be able to make some good music together, but I''ll never personally look at them as being anything other than the guys Axl currently has on payroll to tour under the GN'R name.


bba

enjoy living in your fantasy world where you have the authority to decide what is or isn't Guns N' Roses. 16

Who said anything about authority ?

You're talking about me living in a fantasy world when the truth of the matter is most casual fans would likely agree with my opinion.

In fact, I bet you anything most casual fans (people outside these boards) wouldn't even be able to tell you who the guitar players in GN'R are these days. 

Now, do you really want to talk fantasy ?  16

bba

#115 Re: Guns N' Roses » Lay Your Cards on the Line » 920 weeks ago

Jimmy Zig Zag Bobiadis wrote:
bringbackadler wrote:

I am a Guns N Roses fan.   21

bba

more accurately, you are fan of what Guns N' Roses WAS (past tense)
http://www.chopaway.com/rov2/viewforum.php?id=3

Dude, grow up.

I can be a fan of Axl's new music without behaving like I'm in a cult. (cough..cough htgth)

I consider me and James logic similar on alot of things. Some would call it negative.... others realistic.

Some of you just choose to believe anything, and I do mean anything that you are fed.

Just like the whole making additions with new band members crap. I'm sorry but like James said, Christ himself is not going to make a difference at this point. If you choose to believe BBF and Frank are "the bomb" and are going to make some major difference...good for you........ but I'm sure most would disgree. There's a shitload of good guitar players out there, I don't think that means that they all need credits on Chinese D.

If any of you honestly believe Axl has no role in this album's hold up, I'm sorry, but yes, you are most certainly not being very logical.


bba

#116 Re: Guns N' Roses » Lay Your Cards on the Line » 920 weeks ago

Jimmy Zig Zag Bobiadis wrote:
bringbackadler wrote:
Jimmy Zig Zag Bobiadis wrote:

3. Dont want to speculate on this because its pointless

This whole thread is pointless.

Not everybody has to share the same opinion.

Some people spend too much time at htgth.  lol


bba

no, but you would think if they are posting in the GUNS N ROSES section of the board in the year 2007 that the person would actually be a fan of them and not just trolling for a pipe-dream gay ass reunion.

I am a Guns N Roses fan.   21

I didn't even bring up a reunion. All I said was I don't care for the new Baz songs and some of you Axlites started crying. I never said you weren't allowed to like the songs. Quit whining already.


bba

#117 Re: Guns N' Roses » Lay Your Cards on the Line » 920 weeks ago

Jimmy Zig Zag Bobiadis wrote:

3. Dont want to speculate on this because its pointless

This whole thread is pointless.

Not everybody has to share the same opinion.

Some people spend too much time at htgth.  lol


bba

#118 Re: Guns N' Roses » Love Is A Bitchslap With Axl » 920 weeks ago

Jameslofton wrote:

*passes out valium to everyone in this thread*

14


bba

#119 Re: Guns N' Roses » Love Is A Bitchslap With Axl » 920 weeks ago

madagas wrote:

we know your game and it is stale....that's all I'm saying. It has nothing to do with your opinion on a washed up 80's rocker's new record. Just go read all your negative posts across all the boards you troll.

Hey, if you wanna slide down Axl's shaft like a firefighter on a pole that's your business.

I didn't diss Axl or his band. Last time I checked I don't have to be a Baz nuthugger to post on a GN'R board. You don't have to share my opinion, but don't be dissing me for having one that may differ from yours. It's called life. Get one.

Sorry in advance Admin/mods. 


bba

#120 Re: Guns N' Roses » Love Is A Bitchslap With Axl » 920 weeks ago

madagas wrote:

well, thanks for your opinion...I am sure Baz is quite concerned about what a fan (probably the only fan) of a drug addled junkie wannabe thinks....:rolleyes: don't you have another board to troll around-say mygnr?

the songs and Baz's album won't change the world, no doubt, but they are pretty fun, carefree tunes.

Oh, I'm sorry.   14

I guess you are just a close minded individual who is unable to accept an opinion that isn't 100% Axl ballswinger.

I said I don't care for the songs because I don't.

It has nothing to do with Steven Adler.

Maybe you should be the one looking for another website if you can't deal with an opinion. Try htgth, you have to be 100% ballswinger there, don't you ?  lol

bba

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB