You are not logged in. Please register or login.

#111 Re: Guns N' Roses » The General and Monsters » 150 weeks ago

Sky Dog wrote:

Point is that if you think that there is some magic version of this song out there, you are going to be disappointed.

No, i know they are the final version but i think when we get It in HQ we'll hear better some parts that now sound for me so confused

#112 Re: Guns N' Roses » The General and Monsters » 150 weeks ago

Sky Dog wrote:
carlossacanell wrote:

I think we need a high quality listen to the songs to know how the final mixes are. Cause i can't believe The General bridge has been well mixed. Sounds at a different volume of the part just before and after. Si i think we still don't have a high quality of these songs even they don't change a lot, just little things that put more sense to the final evaluation.

Quite certain what we have now is what will be officially released. Fool’s gold if you believe it’s not the end product

Mate, what i said is that i believe this is not a good quality file. Probably due to the quality some parts like the bridge of the general sounds like a different volume than the rest of the song.
Not neccesary the gold fool comment i think
wink

#113 Re: Guns N' Roses » The General and Monsters » 150 weeks ago

misterID wrote:

The album should have been released in 06 as a double. I think everything was basically done by then. Had Bucket been brought back, the album would have come out. It’s the only way I could see him ever really considering it. According to Brain that was his biggest issue, the album not being released.

That's the point. Totally agree

#114 Re: Guns N' Roses » The General and Monsters » 151 weeks ago

And also i'm agree these leftovers and the rest of them hopufuly to come should have been released in a double album at the begining of 2000 or even before.
Cause they show a new music direction that fit with that era but now they are dificult to be well received by casual fans that don't know the hole history of CD proyecto that began in the middle 90's

#115 Re: Guns N' Roses » The General and Monsters » 151 weeks ago

I think we need a high quality listen to the songs to know how the final mixes are. Cause i can't believe The General bridge has been well mixed. Sounds at a different volume of the part just before and after. Si i think we still don't have a high quality of these songs even they don't change a lot, just little things that put more sense to the final evaluation.

#116 Re: Guns N' Roses » The General and Monsters » 151 weeks ago

Shacklermyrye wrote:
unlucky777 wrote:

those files are 48000Hz (like the leaks). they did not come from a CD

Exactly this.

If these are the final mixes i'm not very happy with them. Specialy with the bridge of The General. Also the last 30 seconds of It are chaotic.
I prefer Monsters. Anyway... I would like these not to be the final versions.

#117 Re: Guns N' Roses » The General and Monsters » 151 weeks ago

daub wrote:
carlossacanell wrote:
daub wrote:

such a leak single is circulating on Facebook

Could you pm to me? Please

?

Sorry, i didn't see the link

#118 Re: Guns N' Roses » The General and Monsters » 151 weeks ago

daub wrote:

such a leak single is circulating on Facebook

Could you pm to me? Please

#119 Re: Guns N' Roses » The General and Monsters » 152 weeks ago

Tyson_458 wrote:

Can someone PLEASE send me a link to Monsters?!? I am only NOW realizing that this is a new song and it leaked.  And did a studio version of The General leak too or is only the live version currently available?

Is there more leaks? I have both songs but not sure if something else has surfaced

#120 Re: Guns N' Roses » KATARINA BENZOVA vs. GUNS N ROSES; GUNDAM TOURING SERVICES U.S. LLC,;G » 153 weeks ago

misterID wrote:

Axl will stick with Fernando no matter what

He is a son for him

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB